super_pig
Well-Known Member
been same here mate.. someone invoked the st swithin clause
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
dont think we'll sign another striker! we need matt phillips type winger lol
With or without Beavon, Preston will be up there at the end of the season IMO.
Some really good recruitment this close season.
The Mail today says they're speaking to Simmonsen.
we should of signed beavon instead of miller and blackman
Lets give them a chance to prove themselves before we slag them off.we should of signed beavon instead of miller and blackman
Not slagging them off i just think we are moving into the new season with our fingers crossed that these 3 new strikers will take to this league, i think signing a player like beavon or even lowe may have been a better bet.Lets give them a chance to prove themselves before we slag them off.
we should of signed beavon instead of miller and blackman
One of the most irritating grammatical errors in the English language. It is creeping in more and more, and it drives me up the wall.
It's bad enough if it's an error Axel, but I suspect, at least in some cases, that it's text-speak laziness. Either way Shakespeare, Dickens and Keats are ruefully shaking their ghostly heads.
It's bad enough if it's an error Axel, but I suspect, at least in some cases, that it's text-speak laziness. Either way Shakespeare, Dickens and Keats are ruefully shaking their ghostly heads.
However...what do you think of 'gotten'?
As a contraction of 'forgotten' or more likely as a poor spoken replacement for 'got' as past participle of 'get'?
The latter is either laziness, coloquialism, dialect or more likely another case of American use becoming the norm. We conjugate it as get-got-got (the last being the past participle of 'get'), Americans conjugate it get-got-gotten. "By the end of the game we'd got/gotten very wet."
Yes but I seem to remember that it was taken from here as the "correct" usage and it was us that changed.
All of course true. I recently heard Jeremy Kyle use 'would of'. Nuff said. If I hear/see it I certainly don't think it's 'text-speak laziness', more a sign of an appalling education or, even worse, an attempt to 'get down wiv da kidz.'
Innit?
However...what do you think of 'gotten'?
Beavon only knowsFor Beavon's sake have we not signed him yet?
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?