Fallowfields team to QUASH QPR

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

FallowfieldBlade

The Names Blade Fallowfield Blade
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Messages
6,365
Reaction score
7,732
You cant win them all but you probably wont win them playing right wingers at left back , Pep heckiola is thinking too much outside the box

I think its time to start bogle time is up for george cant cross a ball baldock :( Zero attacking threat down either side on saturday

If we dont have the players to play 5 at the back play a different formation as long as we play with the same intensity i woul;d be playing 4 at the back until anel is back IMO

Lee gwan wes

--Bogle---Bash---Egan---RND

---Berge---Norwood--Doyle---

---Macatee--Mcburnie--Ndiaye ---
 



Disastrous idea.

Bogle offers much more of a threat going forward, not sure he's ready to do 90 on top of 20 odd mins Saturday.
Khadra was disappointing in advanced positions but can't see who else can play LWB aside from RND which leaves a huge problem at LCB.
Ditching a system the squad is familiar with and expose 2 aging CBs to a pretty effective QPR strike force isn't a smart idea at all and it completely removes the starting points for us building attacks.

Same 11 to start as Saturday barring any further niggles.
 
So baldock, who's as good a full back as they come gets dropped in favour of a full back who's strengths are attacking...

And what exactly has McAtee done to get a start?
 
Good to see McAtee making good use of his left foot on the right. Or are you suggesting they both provide width by both coming inside and leaving a big gap behind them?
 
You cant win them all but you probably wont win them playing right wingers at left back , Pep heckiola is thinking too much outside the box

I think its time to start bogle time is up for george cant cross a ball baldock :( Zero attacking threat down either side on saturday

If we dont have the players to play 5 at the back play a different formation as long as we play with the same intensity i woul;d be playing 4 at the back until anel is back IMO

Lee gwan wes

--Bogle---Bash---Egan---RND

---Berge---Norwood--Doyle---

---Macatee--Mcburnie--Ndiaye ---
Click bait at it's finest 👌
 
Agree about going to four at the back, but I doubt Hecky will change the shape that much. I'd keep Baldock in as Bogle won't be fit enough for 90 (or even 60 or possibly 45) just yet.
 
When Hecky says with so few players available and lack of training for many the last thing he wants to do is change the set up, he’s 100% correct.
 



Good to see McAtee making good use of his left foot on the right. Or are you suggesting they both provide width by both coming inside and leaving a big gap behind them?

He’s gonna play the inverted wide forward role I use it on football manager to great effect

10 seasons 10 titles haven’t lost a game yet
 
Disastrous idea.

Bogle offers much more of a threat going forward, not sure he's ready to do 90 on top of 20 odd mins Saturday.
Khadra was disappointing in advanced positions but can't see who else can play LWB aside from RND which leaves a huge problem at LCB.
Ditching a system the squad is familiar with and expose 2 aging CBs to a pretty effective QPR strike force isn't a smart idea at all and it completely removes the starting points for us building attacks.

Same 11 to start as Saturday barring any further niggles.

Maybe Doyle @ LWB if we had too
 
Wes
Bash Egan RND
Bogle Norwood Doyle Baldock
Berge Ndiaye
McBurnie

Would rather see baldock at left back than Bogle

Baldocks right foot is basically a left foot so it wouldn’t be a huge loss
 
QPR have two of the best 10s in the division in Ilias Chair and Chris Willock.
They're going to offer far more movement and threat than Birmingham did.
I'm actually a bit worried about this one.

Anyway, due to the above, I'd reluctantly bring Bogle back in for a start.


.........................Foderingham
.............Basham.....Egan......RND
........Baldock............................Bogle
................Norwood..........Doyle
..............Berge........................Ndiaye
...........................McBurnie

Subs: A Davies, Gordon, Arblaster, Khadra, McAtee, Brewster, Sharp.

Away at Stoke I'd look to rest one of Berge or Ndiaye. They look like they need a rest. Probably Berge.
 
QPR have two of the best 10s in the division in Ilias Chair and Chris Willock.
They're going to offer far more movement and threat than Birmingham did.
I'm actually a bit worried about this one.

Anyway, due to the above, I'd reluctantly bring Bogle back in for a start.


.........................Foderingham
.............Basham.....Egan......RND
........Baldock............................Bogle
................Norwood..........Doyle
..............Berge........................Ndiaye
...........................McBurnie

Subs: A Davies, Gordon, Arblaster, Khadra, McAtee, Brewster, Sharp.

Away at Stoke I'd look to rest one of Berge or Ndiaye. They look like they need a rest. Probably Berge.
Rest ? Fit young men ?
They need to man-up !
 
Wes
Bash - Egan - RND
Baldock ---------------- Bogle
Norwood - Doyle
Ndiaye Berge
McBurnie
I would play Bogle on the left, at the end of the day Baldock's game is crossing the ball in, whereas i think Bogle can get into shooting positions and he likes to cut inside more often than any other wing back we have, and RND can push out wide in attack to cover that area, the rest of the team picks itself, if Anel is fit as rumoured then the obvious thing is to put him at LCB and RND at LWB.

And no buggering about with 4 at the back. Fair enough make changes if we were really in the shit, but a RWB at LWB isn't the worst Plan B. Whereas 4 at the back is a complete unknown under hecky really
 
So we have 7 defenders out and you want to drop one of our most experienced?
Haha he does it for a reaction. Why do you all rise to it?

Every week he picks someone random or a random formation. Every week people look at it analytically while he sits there and chuckles. And I’m here for that content.
 
QPR have two of the best 10s in the division in Ilias Chair and Chris Willock.
They're going to offer far more movement and threat than Birmingham did.
I'm actually a bit worried about this one.

Anyway, due to the above, I'd reluctantly bring Bogle back in for a start.


.........................Foderingham
.............Basham.....Egan......RND
........Baldock............................Bogle
................Norwood..........Doyle
..............Berge........................Ndiaye
...........................McBurnie

Subs: A Davies, Gordon, Arblaster, Khadra, McAtee, Brewster, Sharp.

Away at Stoke I'd look to rest one of Berge or Ndiaye. They look like they need a rest. Probably Berge.
“A Davies”? How many other players called Davies have we got?
 



Foderingham
.............Basham.....Egan......RND
........Baldock............................Bogle
................Norwood..........Doyle
..............Berge........................Ndiaye
...........................McBurnie
That ^^ that's the one.

I was gonna show that as Option A. With Option B as follows...

Wes
Gordon - Egan - Bash
Baldock - Norwood - Doyle - RND
Berge - Ndiaye
McBurnie
All depends on what Bogle can offer. If it's 20-30mins, go with Option B.
If its 60mins, Option A.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom