Brewster Cost £70 million
Huge member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2021
- Messages
- 2,427
- Reaction score
- 4,577
- Banned
- #1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Reply to.what ? What has the guy said that is anyway derogatory ?How do we know there is an NDA in place?
If there is then once one party has placed information in the public domain the other party has the right of reply without infringing the NDA
interesting that CW has chosen not to; even though my understanding is that both scenarios provide him with a right of reply
Totally agree, he quoted facts if they are not then CW has the right of reply is the point I am making.Reply to.what ? What has the guy said that is anyway derogatory ?
Yeah I got the impression that abdullah was being very very careful not to.say something derogatory and was having to stop.himself ,several times but I assumed it was out of respect but you might be closer to the mark than meTotally agree, he quoted facts if they are not then CW has the right of reply is the point I am making.
Wonder how you found that out !I've heard pineapple juice favourably affects the flavour of semen.
So that's something for our fans to consider next time they want to suck him off after his latest stentorian pronouncements.
Wonder how you found that out !
Addison and MobileBlade have explained elsewhereAlan Biggs came across politicianlike, incoherent rambling without saying anything of substance.
Like SJ I am also unsure of this NDA conspiracy theory that PA by making a statement is baiting CW into biting back and waiving whatever severance he's received by breaching the NDA.
I'm no legal eagle but why would there be a one-sided NDA to censor Wilder? What would the NDA protect either party from? Wouldn't PA have breached an NDA by being candid?
It doesn't really stack up but there could well be more to it then I can fathom. Where's Darren when you need him?
Would it not be a form of respect and congratulation and have nothing whatsoever to do with “arse licking”.Simon Jordan talks about the way football mangers behave. This is coming from a guy that sent champagne to our dressing room after we beat Palace end of 2006 to get promotion.
The 'arse licking of Warnock' had begun.
As soon as Warnock leaves us and Jordan gets his opportunity Warnock is installed as Palace manager.
Hypocrite.
I don't get your point !Simon Jordan talks about the way football mangers behave. This is coming from a guy that sent champagne to our dressing room after we beat Palace end of 2006 to get promotion.
The 'arse licking of Warnock' had begun.
As soon as Warnock leaves us and Jordan gets his opportunity Warnock is installed as Palace manager.
Hypocrite.
An NDA does not prevent any of the signatories from responding to any comments which the recipient finds either untrue or of a nature which could cast their reputation in a bad light, or inflammatory manner. Wilder would have been advised against making any comments of a similar nature, but he's certainly within his rights to respond, without any risk of igniting any penalty clauses. However, he appears to have chosen not to.Alan Biggs came across politicianlike, incoherent rambling without saying anything of substance.
Like SJ I am also unsure of this NDA conspiracy theory that PA by making a statement is baiting CW into biting back and waiving whatever severance he's received by breaching the NDA.
I'm no legal eagle but why would there be a one-sided NDA to censor Wilder? What would the NDA protect either party from? Wouldn't PA have breached an NDA by being candid?
It doesn't really stack up but there could well be more to it then I can fathom. Where's Darren when you need him?
He’d been sulking for months, then tried to resign in December, then wonders why the club wouldn’t sanction bringing in any players in January. The owner made the mistake of trying to stick by him; it was obvious his head had gone and it would have been for the best for both parties to go their separate ways at that point.Listened to it up to Biggs coming on then my brain died, ran past his mumblings and put Jordan back on, Jordan was right in his assessment of managers in that they take they credit and divert the bad stuff, sadly CW has been very guilty of that this season. Now whether CW will reply that is up to him personally I don't think he'll get embroiled in a slanging match, plus I think this kills the rumour of CW going to Palace.
I am a CW fan but, he had done nothing but moan last few months it was almost like "nobody loves me" at the club, this is not over by a long chalk.
Well said old beanHe’d been sulking for months, then tried to resign in December, then wonders why the club wouldn’t sanction bringing in any players in January. The owner made the mistake of trying to stick by him; it was obvious his head had gone and it would have been for the best for both parties to go their separate ways at that point.
The word "stentorian" makes its S24SU forum debut.I've heard pineapple juice favourably affects the flavour of semen.
So that's something for our fans to consider next time they want to suck him off after his latest stentorian pronouncements.
Beautiful word, criminally underused.The word "stentorian" makes its S24SU forum debut.![]()
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?