Sander Berge
- Thread starter INTERUNITED
- Start date
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
coolasanidiot
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2017
- Messages
- 1,569
- Reaction score
- 5,793
But then again.... we are Sheff Utd.
Bang average in a shit team, still makes him better than most this year
JJBlade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2010
- Messages
- 5,633
- Reaction score
- 8,840
- Banned
- #278
Shit team is the biggest clue
Sander Berge is not a right sided midfielder
And he's not a midfielder that spends 90 minutes parked 5 yards in front of the centre halves either.
Just because club retard can't get the best out of him doesn't mean he should be offloaded for whatever we can get for him.
I don't think the release clause means as much when we are relegated. Any serious offer will be considered and it will reduce the wage bill as his replacement won't earn as much. We will probably end up getting what we paid for him and if it is more then that is a bonus.
Bearlie
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2016
- Messages
- 1,359
- Reaction score
- 2,335
- Banned
- #280
We will get 10 / 15 million .....if we get more fair enough im wrong .....to be honest if he had come through ranks was called Paul Smith from Rotherham and performed exactly like for us like sander has ..we would be looking at 500 k ...
He will never play for us again ....
He will never play for us again ....
Completely agree. I don’t want him to leave, you can see he’s quality footballer who had to find his feet in a new league, playing in a team with no confidence and out of position. It’s the reason he was average. His potential is huge and his fee should represent that. It’s a shame his buy out clause sounds close to what we purchased him for.
jono_t2000
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2018
- Messages
- 8,005
- Reaction score
- 15,438
There's a difference between minimum fee release clause and relegation release clause.
The price required to be met for Berge once relegated will be significantly less than any minimum fee release clause if we stayed in the EPL
The price required to be met for Berge once relegated will be significantly less than any minimum fee release clause if we stayed in the EPL
Working Class Hero
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2014
- Messages
- 2,123
- Reaction score
- 4,387
How come whenever Sander Berge playing poorly gets brought up, it's because all the other players are shit, but when assessing the other players, they just are shit?
Bladeloyal
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2009
- Messages
- 5,715
- Reaction score
- 9,647
Seeing as CW,s release clause was 50 m I'm sure Sanders will be upwards of 30 m ,Abdulla ain't a mug
Bladey_blade
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2021
- Messages
- 1,717
- Reaction score
- 5,510
If we get less than 30 someone's had our pants down majorly
MalmoBlade
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2021
- Messages
- 578
- Reaction score
- 998
Berge's release clause was set when we were flying high. It will be for more than we paid, of course it will. Probably £30m
If the release amount isn't met he's our player in the Championship and if he doesn't pull any trees up he will disappear off the radar of every decent club around Europe.
Now of course if we get off to a shitty start and we're 12th at Christmas, Old PA might want to offload to finance a few that might improve us and so a few cheeky bids might come in to tempt the old rascal so yes I can see him going for £15m or so but if we're top 6 and he's a regular, the world can go interfere with themselves unless they meet the release clause.
Whatever the negatives about Lawrence, he's way sharper than Our Kev and I don't think we'll let one of our main assets go for a Sticky Bun and a bazooka joe (one for the oldies)
If the release amount isn't met he's our player in the Championship and if he doesn't pull any trees up he will disappear off the radar of every decent club around Europe.
Now of course if we get off to a shitty start and we're 12th at Christmas, Old PA might want to offload to finance a few that might improve us and so a few cheeky bids might come in to tempt the old rascal so yes I can see him going for £15m or so but if we're top 6 and he's a regular, the world can go interfere with themselves unless they meet the release clause.
Whatever the negatives about Lawrence, he's way sharper than Our Kev and I don't think we'll let one of our main assets go for a Sticky Bun and a bazooka joe (one for the oldies)
Tbh a season in a physical league like the Championship would actually do him more good than going to someone like Liverpool and sitting on their bench. But this is 2021, he'll like sitting on Liverpools spongey bench.
Niceguyeddie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2019
- Messages
- 4,965
- Reaction score
- 8,070
- Banned
- #289
Fuck me thought the covid thread was embarrassing
dn5 shaun
Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2016
- Messages
- 923
- Reaction score
- 1,045
neither has Berge
robbiez666
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 19,237
- Reaction score
- 26,542
- Banned
- #292
When he's singled out as seeing the club as a stepping stone (which I have no problem with) it seems fairly obvious that if that stone sinks we'll have to let him go. We'll get our money back. We'll be a Championship club which reduces his value but he's shown he can compete in the Premier League.
Champagneblade
Stop moaning and get on with it
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2010
- Messages
- 14,924
- Reaction score
- 42,344
It was 15m, not 50m mate. Though I appreciate they sound almost the same!
I'd be amazed if we got a player for 22m who is based on potential and development yet had a release clause that gives us a 7m loss or more.
finlaytheblade
Well-Known Member
Mccabes SUFC !!!
robbiez666
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 19,237
- Reaction score
- 26,542
- Banned
- #296
Wilder mentioned it, unpromoted, in an interview
Bergen Blade
Well-Known Member
If bids do come in from big clubs that have scouted him extensively before and after his spell here, maybe it will be easier to understand.
Flatulent_Bob
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2009
- Messages
- 15,802
- Reaction score
- 22,577
The club put out that he wouldn’t be going for a significant fee, which was confirmed by the journalist to be more than £30M.
Why on earth would a buying club insert a release clause for less than you paid? It makes no sense whatsoever.
Specifically telling a journalist a figure before accepting a significantly lower one also is totally illogical. Why would an under fire board actively shoot themselves in the foot by putting this out there when they didn’t need to say anything?
No one would have been surprised if we’d accepted an offer for him but they’ve set a bar.
Why on earth would a buying club insert a release clause for less than you paid? It makes no sense whatsoever.
Specifically telling a journalist a figure before accepting a significantly lower one also is totally illogical. Why would an under fire board actively shoot themselves in the foot by putting this out there when they didn’t need to say anything?
No one would have been surprised if we’d accepted an offer for him but they’ve set a bar.
Bergen Blade
Well-Known Member
I wonder if a lot of Blades fans expected a Fernandes, although Berge is more of a Matic.
Our team and tactics haven't worked at all this season and individual players have looked worse than they really are. Complete opposite to last season. Berge isn't the flair type who could lift us up from the mud.
If clubs will bid for him this summer it will be because they think their team needs a Matic type.
robbiez666
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 19,237
- Reaction score
- 26,542
- Banned
- #300
I think he's style of play is glaringly different to the way we play. I suspect that might be less noticeable if we were a side with high possession. I suspect a much bigger team than us with give us our money back for him.
Similar threads
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?