Cerberus Blade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2015
- Messages
- 13,631
- Reaction score
- 20,983
If he could have gone to another club, played and earned £50k a week I doubt he’d have starved. I don’t know the circumstances and the Sunderland documentary might well have been filmed with bias but the choice presented was “leave and we can keep some of the admin staff on”. He chose to stay.
I’ll trust Wilder to judge his character though, he’s worked with him.
I don't blame him for doing that tbh. When these clubs make such deals with players they do so knowing that the club's fortunes could change, for better or worse, in the future. It's the club's responsibility, not the players responsibility, to make sure that any such deals do not jeopardise the future of the club or the people within it. If they didn't do that then sorry...that's the club's problem - not the player's problem. Why should the retaining of admin staff suddenly be his problem because the club hadn't structured the deal properly? That's a form of coercion/emotional blackmail for the club to suggest that. It's a short career and I don't blame him for putting himself first.