Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
That should be a never event. Any employer would review it and fire someone with immediate effect.Why was he allowed to referee that game? He’s from Manchester FFS!!
He should never be allowed to officiate ever again. One of the worst decisions I’ve ever seen with that first goal.
That should be a never event. Any employer would review it and fire someone with immediate effect.
Was he the City player that put a great tackle in on Fleck?Why was he allowed to referee that game? He’s from Manchester FFS!!
He should never be allowed to officiate ever again. One of the worst decisions I’ve ever seen with that first goal.
If a few lads beat the shit out of him he'll not do it again the cuntWhy was he allowed to referee that game? He’s from Manchester FFS!!
He should never be allowed to officiate ever again. One of the worst decisions I’ve ever seen with that first goal.
As the ref didnt touch it there was no reason to stop the game ( according to the laws of the game).He obstructed Fleck and, whether he touched it or not, influenced the passage of play. Crazy that that was not overturned! I make that -7 on VAR now![]()
As the ref didnt touch it there was no reason to stop the game ( according to the laws of the game).
And those comments just make me even more angry about what happened!Chris Wilder on the incident:
“I’ve been to see the referee and he has been honest about it. We make mistakes and I believe he made one too and I’m sure he did as well. It is a game-changer. It happened that quick and I thought he could have been helped by his colleagues a little bit,” Wilder said. “We talk about the new rule where if the referee touches ball then he has to blow up, so surely if he is in the vicinity and hinders us then he makes a sensible decision. If he made the sensible decision then I don’t think no-one in the ground would have said anything about it. Unfortunately that has gone against us.
As usual wilder saying it as it is. The ref has dropped a bollock but he won't dig him out for risk of reprisals from the premier league.
He can't risk a touchline ban but I hope at the end of the season he comes out and just calls out var for what it is. A load of bollocks
No but if the ref interferes with play which he did then he has the authority to continue or stop playAs the ref didnt touch it there was no reason to stop the game ( according to the laws of the game).
No but if the ref interferes with play which he did then he has the authority to continue or stop play
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?