John Lundstram: An apology

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Think it was Kozzy_is_my_Dad who enquired as to what made the difference with young Lunny.

I recall one of Wilder's interviews where he described him and his colleagues as teachers, men capable of taking plyares on a journey where they learn more about themselves as players and in the process improve along the way. Must admit I was uncertain along the way, but it was clear that Lunny had something so worth persevering with.....and what a player we appear to have unearthed.

Underneath that physicality, and for well less than a million, we have a player who seems to have learnt that it's not a crime to think, move, pass, receive, and make himself available, and do it continuously for 90 minutes. Now, more than ever, the whole idea of paying large amounts to justify your existence as a club seems clumsy and lazy when you realise that it's possible to find players for relatively small amounts, and through careful polishing turn a rough stone into a gem of a player.

None of which is to suggest that paying large amounts is yesterday's news, of course we'll continue to consider paying large amounts when called upon (all this assumes we remain a Prem club), but through being able to think outside of current received wisdom we have understood that good players, players with potential, often slip through the gaps that exist in football. Wilder, and Knill too, seem to have retained the ability to see what has been overlooked elsewhere. Lundstram is a wonderful example of a player given the chance to show what he's capable of, and what a player he is.....one note of caution, whilst I love much of the revisionist critiquing that surrounds Lundstram this season, it's probably fair to the lad to see what he'll be like next season before declaring him the answer to England's woes.
 



5-1 win against Notts County in April 1979.

Finnieston, Anderson 2 were the scorers against West Ham.

That was one of a series of results around that time that lulled me into a false belief that we would avoid relegation.

The others were the 3-0 demolition of West Ham and the 3-1 win at Newcastle. There was also the less spectacular win against Bristol Rovers. 4 wins in 5 matches.

We really were a Jekyll and Hyde team around that period. Very impressive one minute then absolutely woeful the next as shown when a week or so after the win at Newcastle we lost 4-0 at Cardiff and then 6-2 at Sunderland.
 
That was one of a series of results around that time that lulled me into a false belief that we would avoid relegation.

The others were the 3-0 demolition of West Ham and the 3-1 win at Newcastle. There was also the less spectacular win against Bristol Rovers. 4 wins in 5 matches.

We really were a Jekyll and Hyde team around that period. Very impressive one minute then absolutely woeful the next as shown when a week or so after the win at Newcastle we lost 4-0 at Cardiff and then 6-2 at Sunderland.
And rock bottom Blackburn did the double over us.
 
And rock bottom Blackburn did the double over us.

And they completed their double over us just a few days after we appeared to have dug a second escape route by beating Charlton in a real crunch match!

Losing at home to Blackburn was very reminiscent of losing to Fulham at home 11 years previously. The only difference being that we didn't throw away a two goal lead against Blackburn.
 
Last edited:
And they completed their double over us just a few days after we appeared to have dug a second escape route by beating Charlton in a real crunch match!

Losing at home to Blackburn at home was very reminiscent of losing to Fulham at home 11 years previously. The only difference being that we didn't throw away a two goal lead against Blackburn.
And Blackburn had a player sent off (the late Russell Coughlin for a bad foul on Sabella) in the 1st half at the Lane fixture!
 
You simply don’t start your career on Evertons’ books, play for England U17s, U18s, U19s and U20s and be a crap player, you can’t.

He’s always been a good player who has just needed more time to adapt and for Wilder to find the right way to utilise him, Lunny and us are seeing great rewards for patience.
 
You simply don’t start your career on Evertons’ books, play for England U17s, U18s, U19s and U20s and be a crap player, you can’t.

He’s always been a good player who has just needed more time to adapt and for Wilder to find the right way to utilise him, Lunny and us are seeing great rewards for patience.

Danny Cadamarteri and Jon O’Connor say ‘hi’. 👋
 
I've always been a fan, Lunny has always wanted to be involved when on the pitch, always shouting for the ball, never went hiding. He should be a football legend just for the "Welcome to Sheffield" he gave Grealish, even the ref stopped and gave him a round of applause (ok, maybe he didn't, but should have). The lad has always been good, but now he is great, he is blossoming at the right time, and thank god it is with us.

UTB.
 
I think a regular problem in our fanbase is not necessarily calling crap performances crap, but more:
  • confirmation bias, where because people think Player X is crap they notice their mistakes relatively more than others
  • inability to consider the potential for players to improve substantially

The latter leads to people overrating declining popular players over those with the potential to grow. At some point towards the end of last season I suggested that Lundstram was a better option for the bench than Coutts, and then that Lundstram should be kept while Coutts released. This did not appear to be widely shared. Many in fact thought we should have done the reverse. Don’t get me wrong, I in no way whatsoever expected this sort of prominent role for Lundstram, but I did think he had the potential to improve.

Lundstram is currently the same age Stevens was when he was binned by Villa for not being good enough. Sometimes it takes players till their mid-20s to really kick on.
Good points there, and very true. Also, to add, there's the type of football we've been served and have been used to over the years (no fault of the fans, just the type of football that's allowed us to "punch above our weight") - hence why a Stuart Pearce booming a penalty kick, but missing, is forgiven more than a 'fancy' player walking up and scooping it into the arms of the keeper.
Even if the blaster penalty taker misses more often than the 'decieve with the eyes' one, the one time it softly rolls into the keeper's arms, fans want to know why he didn't just blast it.
This also works for not crossing v a bad cross that the keeper saves and the opposition score on the break, a short corner v a corner into the box that is headed clear and results in a goal, or a quick free kick that breaks down.
Wilder has and is hopefully more and more, changing the way we play and how the fans see the game.
Our players never faffed about to the frustration of Chris, but were specifically told not to cross if nothing was available.
With confidence in the defence, the players up front are more free to put in speculative crosses, and have shots, and a backward or sideways pass from Lunny is becoming more appreciated by the fans.
Plus he is playing a bit better.
But its all down to Wilder, and the fans realising how brilliant and free The Blades are now playing.
It's getting better and better.

Edit: also as fans clap Lunny for a sideways pass his confidence grows and then he becomes more positive and gets forward more. He has changed since his early years.
 
Last edited:
Jon Richardson on the TFP today: “the world is divided into two kinds of people: those that do have Lundstram in their fantasy football, and those that don’t.”

Lundstramania is growing at rapid pace.
 
Labelling players as crap, or immediately wishing to sideline them is such a tiresome message board trick. McBurnie and Robinson are in the exact same position to Lundstram when he arrived. Both relatively young and new to a higher league.

Neither are consistently performing, but so what? It’s clear we’ve gone with 5 very different strikers to rotate when each is best suited. It’s bloody hard to get into our XI, never mind look an accomplished Premier League striker straight out the Championship.

It might be next season when we see them looking comfortable at this level (assuming we survive). It may never happen. But it’s obvious there’s potential there that needs nurturing, and that’s exactly how our club needs to operate.

Stop it. Stop it right now. Common sense and cogent argument? We must contain this outbreak immediately. You will immediately be removed to an isolation hospital where your knees will be forcibly jerked and your agendal gland surgically adjusted.
 
Jon Richardson on the TFP today: “the world is divided into two kinds of people: those that do have Lundstram in their fantasy football, and those that don’t.”

Lundstramania is growing at rapid pace.

As is the legend himself. Covers 70 yards in no time if there’s a chance at the end of it.
 
Lunny is peforming because he is now in a system that suits him. He wasn't a Paul Coutts, he has always been a box-box midfielder and he can now thrive in that role. He has also got physically stronger, and probably things have just started to click for him. He is still a young man.

Jolly well done to Lunny for his form and proving lots of people wrong!
 



Lunny is peforming because he is now in a system that suits him. He wasn't a Paul Coutts, he has always been a box-box midfielder and he can now thrive in that role.

I always like to remind folk too that he was never signed as backup to Coutts – the Bleacher Report White board that Wilder was drawing on very clearly had him as the backup to Fleck. Quina was supposed to cover Coutts. I suspect Lundstram might have faired better that season had he been playing alongside Coutts in the more box-to-box role of the two than try and replace Coutts.
 
I always like to remind folk too that he was never signed as backup to Coutts – the Bleacher Report White board that Wilder was drawing on very clearly had him as the backup to Fleck. Quina was supposed to cover Coutts. I suspect Lundstram might have faired better that season had he been playing alongside Coutts in the more box-to-box role of the two than try and replace Coutts.
I said at the time he was dropped into the first team too quickly. I don’t think it was ever intended that he’d play so much first team football so early. I think the idea was to bring him in slowly but then Coutts broke his leg.
 
I said at the time he was dropped into the first team too quickly. I don’t think it was ever intended that he’d play so much first team football so early. I think the idea was to bring him in slowly but then Coutts broke his leg.

Further to that, I don’t think he did that badly in his early games. He was caught being ponderous on the ball too many times, and he went for the occasional long pass too many. But for a lad out of league 1, he didn’t stink the place out. My biggest concern was his fitness, which seemed relatively poor back then.
 
I need to apologise too, I thought he was rubbish and would have sold him a long time ago.

Probably shows why I work on a building site and not as a football manager
 
Further to that, I don’t think he did that badly in his early games. He was caught being ponderous on the ball too many times, and he went for the occasional long pass too many. But for a lad out of league 1, he didn’t stink the place out. My biggest concern was his fitness, which seemed relatively poor back then.
Also, what quite a number of fans factored in was the really poor record we had when Lunny started games for us, which was understandable but you couldn’t blame Lunny for that, it was just an unfortunate set of circumstances that coincided with him playing.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom