Ageism in football journalism?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Cerberus Blade

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2015
Messages
13,631
Reaction score
20,993
Mr Shields is fond of reminding us just how "old" (or young?) Wilder is, and does it regularly. A quote from his recent report on yesterday's game v Leicester:

"Harvey Barnes' strike, which settled this frantic but fractious contest, was labelled "magical" by both the 51-year-old and Brendan Rodgers, his rival across the technical area".

Can someone tell me what the relevance of Wilder being 51 has got to do with anything?

Does being 51 make Wilder's achievements all the more remarkable? What about the week before when the 51 year old Wilder faced the 72 year old Roy Hodgson?

I just think this is an irrelevant statistic and has no relevance to the rest of the report. So why mention it?
 



Mr Shields is fond of reminding us just how "old" (or young?) Wilder is, and does it regularly. A quote from his recent report on yesterday's game v Leicester:

"Harvey Barnes' strike, which settled this frantic but fractious contest, was labelled "magical" by both the 51-year-old and Brendan Rodgers, his rival across the technical area".

Can someone tell me what the relevance of Wilder being 51 has got to do with anything?

Does being 51 make Wilder's achievements all the more remarkable? What about the week before when the 51 year old Wilder faced the 72 year old Roy Hodgson?

I just think this is an irrelevant statistic and has no relevance to the rest of the report. So why mention it?

It's mere hackery.

It's like him being described as "the former Halifax manager" and later on in the same piece in order to avoid repetition "the ex-Northampton boss".

Anyway, he's 52 next month so it will be all change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dkc
Mr Shields is fond of reminding us just how "old" (or young?) Wilder is, and does it regularly. A quote from his recent report on yesterday's game v Leicester:

"Harvey Barnes' strike, which settled this frantic but fractious contest, was labelled "magical" by both the 51-year-old and Brendan Rodgers, his rival across the technical area".

Can someone tell me what the relevance of Wilder being 51 has got to do with anything?

Does being 51 make Wilder's achievements all the more remarkable? What about the week before when the 51 year old Wilder faced the 72 year old Roy Hodgson?

I just think this is an irrelevant statistic and has no relevance to the rest of the report. So why mention it?
It's utter irrelevant bollocks in any form of journalism.
 
They do this shit with everyone regardless of their age. They do it with anything that could describe someone too; previous clubs, nationality, penis length etc. It's just a thing.
 
They do this shit with everyone regardless of their age. They do it with anything that could describe someone too; previous clubs, nationality, penis length etc. It's just a thing.
Sloppy talentless tosspots. They obviously come from the school that populates tv quiz/reality/talent shows when contestants are asked their age. “I’m 76 years old Simon” well congratufuckinglations for still being alive mate. My dad is 87 and a) he doesn’t expect a round of applause for making it through breakfast each day and b) would find it deeply offensive to have any aspect of his achievements somehow weighted due to his age.
 
The thing that annoys me about a lot of old folk, (and i'm one before you ask), is the ones when asked their age say "I'll be 76 NEXT", or whatever their age is, +1. They must consider it a badge of honour or something. Things don't change much do they, ask a 5year old their age and they will proudly say nearly 6. It only reverses when you are 40 and fancying a 30year old, then you suddenly become 35!.
 
Mr Shields is fond of reminding us just how "old" (or young?) Wilder is, and does it regularly. A quote from his recent report on yesterday's game v Leicester:

"Harvey Barnes' strike, which settled this frantic but fractious contest, was labelled "magical" by both the 51-year-old and Brendan Rodgers, his rival across the technical area".

Can someone tell me what the relevance of Wilder being 51 has got to do with anything?

Does being 51 make Wilder's achievements all the more remarkable? What about the week before when the 51 year old Wilder faced the 72 year old Roy Hodgson?

I just think this is an irrelevant statistic and has no relevance to the rest of the report. So why mention it?

If you were comparing him to Lampard it would be a good thing to mention from the perspective of Wilder actually having experience and having to work hard to get to be a PL manager. Also when compared to Woy it’s relevant as it shows the experience differential between the 2. Apart from that it’s bollocks.
 
The fifty one year old, who was fifty only a year ago, will be fifty two next.
 
The thing that annoys me about a lot of old folk, (and i'm one before you ask), is the ones when asked their age say "I'll be 76 NEXT", or whatever their age is, +1. They must consider it a badge of honour or something. Things don't change much do they, ask a 5year old their age and they will proudly say nearly 6. It only reverses when you are 40 and fancying a 30year old, then you suddenly become 35!.
“Personally, I’m delighted if my friends make it through breakfast”

Noel Coward
 
Shields is, and always has been, a pathetic excuse for a journalist, and given the Stir's long-standing affiliation with the pigs, he is probably a wendy as well. Disregard everything he writes. The man is a joke.
 
The thing that annoys me about a lot of old folk, (and i'm one before you ask), is the ones when asked their age say "I'll be 76 NEXT", or whatever their age is, +1. They must consider it a badge of honour or something. Things don't change much do they, ask a 5year old their age and they will proudly say nearly 6. It only reverses when you are 40 and fancying a 30year old, then you suddenly become 35!.

I reckon they think that if they say it enough times they’re going to live to see it. A bit like Dorothy tapping her ruby slippers and wishing she was in Kansas, or the Pigs crying over their beers every Satdi and wishing they were in the Premier League.
 
Simply a way of avoiding repetition of 'Wilder' when he'll be mentioned several times in a story.

Referring to him as ‘genius’ or ‘the second coming’ would be better than using his age.
 



Shields is, and always has been, a pathetic excuse for a journalist, and given the Stir's long-standing affiliation with the pigs, he is probably a wendy as well. Disregard everything he writes. The man is a joke.
always good to read a fair and balanced post. Well done
 
It's a quick and easy way of making your writing appear less repetitive whilst also dropping in a little fact to give the impression you know what you're talking about. No, it doesn't really work but that's mostly because they aren't writing anything interesting to begin with.
 
Fair comment. Posting drunk clearly not the greatest idea. Not a fan of him as a journalist, but that was unnecessary and stupid. Thanks for calling me out. Must remember to think before posting, especially after too much beer.
we've all been there. :)
 
Fair comment. Posting drunk clearly not the greatest idea. Not a fan of him as a journalist, but that was unnecessary and stupid. Thanks for calling me out. Must remember to think before posting, especially after too much beer.
He’s no Owl either!
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom