Team for next sunday

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Yes, as a sub. He’ll be a very effective substitute, as I said weeks ago. What’s wrong with that?

I see he’s currently leading our player ratings by a mile. What risible Bladey nonsense. Embarrassing.
Bladey claptrap.
 



Didn't Wilder say he couldn't wait for Sharp to lead the team out in our first match at home??

Also, everyone saying he hasn't spent £10-20m on players to be on the bench - Wilder wouldn't play someone just because of a price tag, he'll play whoever is best to win a match!
 
I love Billy, he pounced on a rebound and scored. It's what he does brilliantly in close.

Look back at the pre season games. Lunny has applied himself and he's obviously listened to his manager. Come back lighter and fitter and there's a job for you.

Wilder has never stopped talking about the importance of home games, the fans, the players, and all the goodwill generated by our enormous team spirit.

Lundstram not withstanding, I'm more concerned about Norwood and his sometimes frail performances over he last 4 weeks. I can see Billy leading the side out, and a newer, sharper midfield, on the starting team sheet, against a Palace side, ripe for the picking at our place.

Same goes for our expensive strikers. Gerremon.
 
.................................... Also Think Norwood days are limited. You can see why he was ditched by clubs when they reached the premier

Norwood may be shown to not be up to it and well know within a few weeks.

I can see a fully fit Morrison replacing Norwood in a few weeks

Fwiw, i actually think Lunny had a better game than Norwood who was pretty invisible.

......

Lundstram not withstanding, I'm more concerned about Norwood and his sometimes frail performances over he last 4 weeks. I can see Billy leading the side out, and a newer, sharper midfield, on the starting team sheet, against a Palace side, ripe for the picking at our place.

Erm.... Watching a different game?

UvVq3aR.png
 
Maybe he’ll score as a substitute, just like yesterday?

It’s started. I knew it would.
Remember having a similar argument with you last season. That worked out well...

Next week’s game is exactly the sort of game Sharp will score in. He won’t and shouldn’t play every week, but next week is one where he should.
 
S40BLADE posted:
1565515657756.png

Brilliant. Seeing them all race towards us together with such genuine passion was the enduring image of yesterday.

If you would have shown me this back in June and told me this is a photo from our first game....... I would've been quite pleased!

A picture of our starting 3 v Palace as well I think.
 
Remember having a similar argument with you last season. That worked out well...

Next week’s game is exactly the sort of game Sharp will score in. He won’t and shouldn’t play every week, but next week is one where he should.

We hadn’t signed McBurnie, Mousset and Robinson last season. As I’ve said countless times, anyone who thinks we’ve paid tens of millions for players to sit on the bench is bonkers.

What is wrong with Sharp being used as a hugely effective substitute? Does it really offend Bladey sensibilities that much? It worked rather well yesterday.

Oh, Dem Bladey Blades...
 
Didn't Wilder say he couldn't wait for Sharp to lead the team out in our first match at home??

Also, everyone saying he hasn't spent £10-20m on players to be on the bench - Wilder wouldn't play someone just because of a price tag, he'll play whoever is best to win a match!

That’s not quite the point. He wouldn’t have spent that sort of money if he didn’t think those players were better than those we already have. It follows that they haven’t come to sit on the bench.

Billy can lead the team out and then take his place on the bench. Sentimentality can’t dictate selection. That’s Sunday League thinking. We’re a professional Premier League team.

I knew the Sharp drivel was imminent...
 
Given the 18 on duty yesterday, who would drop out for Mousset and Morrison ?

Suspensions and injuries will kick in but there's every chance we're going to have a £5M plus signing not making the bench every week.
 
i think it’ll be the same team. palace’s best player is zaha, get lunny sitting on him and cancel him out the game.
I think Besic will be the bloke for that role eventually. Surprised he was on the bench though, as he hasn't had a full pre season apparently.
 



We hadn’t signed McBurnie, Mousset and Robinson last season. As I’ve said countless times, anyone who thinks we’ve paid tens of millions for players to sit on the bench is bonkers.

What is wrong with Sharp being used as a hugely effective substitute? Does it really offend Bladey sensibilities that much? It worked rather well yesterday.

Oh, Dem Bladey Blades...
What’s wrong with playing him in games where he can make an impact? I’ve said he shouldn’t play each match, so you can dampen the Bladey-Blade hyperbole.
 
I thought Lunny was pretty good yesterday TBF but agree at home we need to be more creative

So I would actually start Billy upfront with Robinson and stick Didsy just behind them
 
That’s not quite the point. He wouldn’t have spent that sort of money if he didn’t think those players were better than those we already have. It follows that they haven’t come to sit on the bench.

Billy can lead the team out and then take his place on the bench. Sentimentality can’t dictate selection. That’s Sunday League thinking. We’re a professional Premier League team.

I knew the Sharp drivel was imminent...

What I wrote was not 'Sharp drivel', merely quoting Wilder at the end of last season. I don't care who gets picked because I know Wilder knows a lot more than me about our squad and football management in general.

As for the new players, again Wilder knows best. Mousset is apparently unfit so that's £10m not even in the 18. If McBurnie struggles to get up to speed with our play, either on the training ground or in matches, he won't start.
There are many, many examples of players being picked because of their name, price tag or, internationally, the team they play for, and it not working.

I tend not to comment on these posts (and many others) as there is very little point because Wilder will do what he sees as best for the club.

As I said, I was stating Wilder and also describing his 'nobody is bigger than the club' mentality.
 
Maybe Norwood appeared quieter yesterday because of how the team were set up. This is a formation that was used sparingly last season and requires the midfield 3 to play different roles. Norwood has more time on the ball when we play an attacking formation. He's an important player for us.

I would like to see a more attacking performance v palace
 
To put things in perspective all 3 of the midfield played well and grew into the game as a unit but they can do much better which is encouraging

It was only after we went behind that we looked like wilders Sheffield united and deservedly got back into the game and in fact Bournemouth couldn't deal with it

After reacting like a kid with no pressies at Xmas when I saw the team sheet .I ended the day feeling confident that we will compete in this division and that our style of play will serve us well .saw some good signs
 
We need to win our Home games against teams in the bottom 10. Palace IMO are one of those. Despite looking comfortable, missing a couple of chances and having the greater possession the starting formation to-day ran out of steam after the hour mark. Bournemouth after their first real period of pressure in the game scored after 62 minutes.

CW made the right decision, changed the formation to our more natural shape and we immediately were on the front foot pushing Bournemouth back as they had to worry about a number 10. Deserved equaliser from our most natural goalscorer.

It would be madness to start with the same formation at Home against the likes of Palace. Sharp has to start for me as does Freemen after a good cameo to-day. 3-4-1-2 we have to be on the front foot from the off.

Exactly - pushing teams back and penning then in was a major factor of our defensive strength. Stands to reason that if we have more possession in the attacking third, we’re going to concede less.
 
Lundstram against Ryan Fraser is one thing, Lundstram against Zaha is something that’s nightmare inducing.

The best way to keep Zaha away from our goal is to attack them. Simple as that.

I would say that’s the best strategy against all bar the top 6.
 
That’s not quite the point. He wouldn’t have spent that sort of money if he didn’t think those players were better than those we already have. It follows that they haven’t come to sit on the bench.

Billy can lead the team out and then take his place on the bench. Sentimentality can’t dictate selection. That’s Sunday League thinking. We’re a professional Premier League team.

I knew the Sharp drivel was imminent...

What Sharp drivel? He scored 24 goals last term, comparable to 2 players that were sold for a combined fee of nearly £40m. He scored within 6 minutes of being on the pitch yesterday. Picking him to start is objectively sensible.
 
Henderson
Basham Egan O'Connell
Baldock Stevens
Norwood Fleck
Freeman
Robinson McGoldrick


Subs: Verrips, K Freeman, Jagielka, Lundstram, Morrison, Sharp, McBurnie.

For now, I'd more or less stick with the side that did well on Saturday.

If we wanted to be very attacking from the off we could play with a different attacking 5:

Norwood Freeman
McGoldrick
2 from Sharp McBurnie Robinson

But I still think it's a little early to be starting like that & I'm not sure whether Freeman is a viable alternative for Fleck yet.
 
What Sharp drivel? He scored 24 goals last term, comparable to 2 players that were sold for a combined fee of nearly £40m. He scored within 6 minutes of being on the pitch yesterday. Picking him to start is objectively sensible.

Well, no, on yesterday’s evidence, picking him to come off the bench and score is objectively sensible.
 
So you’re saying what? He doesn’t have the legs for 90 minutes anymore?

He’s not getting any younger, is he? Are you saying that if he’s ‘got the legs’ he starts every game? If so, I disagree. I see him as a very important impact sub, in the same manner as Kevin Phillips and even Trevor Francis in their latter years.

The crucial difference is that I don’t put a premium on a player because of where they come from or which team they support. That’s Sunday League thinking, but in S2 I’m used to that.
 



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom