- Banned
- #61
Bladey claptrap.Yes, as a sub. He’ll be a very effective substitute, as I said weeks ago. What’s wrong with that?
I see he’s currently leading our player ratings by a mile. What risible Bladey nonsense. Embarrassing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Bladey claptrap.Yes, as a sub. He’ll be a very effective substitute, as I said weeks ago. What’s wrong with that?
I see he’s currently leading our player ratings by a mile. What risible Bladey nonsense. Embarrassing.
Bladey claptrap.
.................................... Also Think Norwood days are limited. You can see why he was ditched by clubs when they reached the premier
Norwood may be shown to not be up to it and well know within a few weeks.
I can see a fully fit Morrison replacing Norwood in a few weeks
Fwiw, i actually think Lunny had a better game than Norwood who was pretty invisible.
......
Lundstram not withstanding, I'm more concerned about Norwood and his sometimes frail performances over he last 4 weeks. I can see Billy leading the side out, and a newer, sharper midfield, on the starting team sheet, against a Palace side, ripe for the picking at our place.
Not saying I wouldn't like to see this at some point but who's getting dropped?Play Besic and Rav.
Let Besic play a Trevor Hockey 'protecting' role and allow Rav to run riot.
Remember having a similar argument with you last season. That worked out well...Maybe he’ll score as a substitute, just like yesterday?
It’s started. I knew it would.

Remember having a similar argument with you last season. That worked out well...
Next week’s game is exactly the sort of game Sharp will score in. He won’t and shouldn’t play every week, but next week is one where he should.
Didn't Wilder say he couldn't wait for Sharp to lead the team out in our first match at home??
Also, everyone saying he hasn't spent £10-20m on players to be on the bench - Wilder wouldn't play someone just because of a price tag, he'll play whoever is best to win a match!
Erm.... Watching a different game?
![]()
I think Besic will be the bloke for that role eventually. Surprised he was on the bench though, as he hasn't had a full pre season apparently.i think it’ll be the same team. palace’s best player is zaha, get lunny sitting on him and cancel him out the game.
What’s wrong with playing him in games where he can make an impact? I’ve said he shouldn’t play each match, so you can dampen the Bladey-Blade hyperbole.We hadn’t signed McBurnie, Mousset and Robinson last season. As I’ve said countless times, anyone who thinks we’ve paid tens of millions for players to sit on the bench is bonkers.
What is wrong with Sharp being used as a hugely effective substitute? Does it really offend Bladey sensibilities that much? It worked rather well yesterday.
Oh, Dem Bladey Blades...
That’s not quite the point. He wouldn’t have spent that sort of money if he didn’t think those players were better than those we already have. It follows that they haven’t come to sit on the bench.
Billy can lead the team out and then take his place on the bench. Sentimentality can’t dictate selection. That’s Sunday League thinking. We’re a professional Premier League team.
I knew the Sharp drivel was imminent...
We need to win our Home games against teams in the bottom 10. Palace IMO are one of those. Despite looking comfortable, missing a couple of chances and having the greater possession the starting formation to-day ran out of steam after the hour mark. Bournemouth after their first real period of pressure in the game scored after 62 minutes.
CW made the right decision, changed the formation to our more natural shape and we immediately were on the front foot pushing Bournemouth back as they had to worry about a number 10. Deserved equaliser from our most natural goalscorer.
It would be madness to start with the same formation at Home against the likes of Palace. Sharp has to start for me as does Freemen after a good cameo to-day. 3-4-1-2 we have to be on the front foot from the off.
Lundstram against Ryan Fraser is one thing, Lundstram against Zaha is something that’s nightmare inducing.
The best way to keep Zaha away from our goal is to attack them. Simple as that.
That’s not quite the point. He wouldn’t have spent that sort of money if he didn’t think those players were better than those we already have. It follows that they haven’t come to sit on the bench.
Billy can lead the team out and then take his place on the bench. Sentimentality can’t dictate selection. That’s Sunday League thinking. We’re a professional Premier League team.
I knew the Sharp drivel was imminent...
What Sharp drivel? He scored 24 goals last term, comparable to 2 players that were sold for a combined fee of nearly £40m. He scored within 6 minutes of being on the pitch yesterday. Picking him to start is objectively sensible.
Well, no, on yesterday’s evidence, picking him to come off the bench and score is objectively sensible.
So you’re saying what? He doesn’t have the legs for 90 minutes anymore?
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?