Charlie Adams says we will shock the Premier League

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Sothall_Blade

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
6,787
Reaction score
8,719
https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/spo...s/stoke-charlie-adam-sheffield-united-2813205

“Charlie Adam has been paying Sheffield United a huge compliment ahead of Stoke's meeting with the promoted Blades on Sunday.

Adam was a studio guest on Radio Five Live this evening when United skipper Ollie Norwood came on the phone.

Sheffield have won automatic promotion playing a rare brand of football which sees their centre backs given licence to vacate their normal position and join in attacks to try and out-number teams down the sides

And that encouraged Adam to say to Norwood: "When you go to the Premier League, you'll shock teams, the way you play.

"At home, you'll be able to play the way you want to play.


1_charlie-adam-5-live.jpg

Radio regular... Charlie Adam

"Everybody understands that going to Man City, Tottenham and Arsenal is tough, but at home, the way you play, you're going to cause the big ones problems because they'll never have come up against (Jack) O'Connell overlapping the left wing back, or (Chris) Basham overlapping the right full back.
 



Also worth mentioning that they talk about the L**ds match shortly after us. Ian Wright makes himself look a tit who clearly didn't watch the L**ds v Villa game.

"The villa lad got back up and was fine" where did he get that info from? His best mate Patrick Bamford? Kodja went off injured and Villa had no striker.

Wrighty don't pretend like you watched the match or know anything about it. You were actually watching Arsenal getting spanked by Leicester and then getting moody about it on Twitter.
 
I have never really liked Adam, but he spoke a lot of sense on here. It was nice to listen to someone who could name a few of our players and where they play and our tactics. It always helps when they like us too.
 
Didn't know Oli was a Burnley fan, good interview though.
 
Also worth mentioning that they talk about the L**ds match shortly after us. Ian Wright makes himself look a tit who clearly didn't watch the L**ds v Villa game.

"The villa lad got back up and was fine" where did he get that info from? His best mate Patrick Bamford? Kodja went off injured and Villa had no striker.

Wrighty don't pretend like you watched the match or know anything about it. You were actually watching Arsenal getting spanked by Leicester and then getting moody about it on Twitter.
All his assumptions were wrong and it was so obvious he hadn't seen the game. Everyone is going on about playing to the whistle, to me the point was that Roberts was it? the Leeds player acted as though he was going to put the ball out, which was why the Villa players all stopped and then didn't. Sneaky in the extreme
 
Also worth mentioning that they talk about the L**ds match shortly after us. Ian Wright makes himself look a tit who clearly didn't watch the L**ds v Villa game.

"The villa lad got back up and was fine" where did he get that info from? His best mate Patrick Bamford? Kodja went off injured and Villa had no striker.

Wrighty don't pretend like you watched the match or know anything about it. You were actually watching Arsenal getting spanked by Leicester and then getting moody about it on Twitter.

The thing that annoyed me was that it wasn't that Leeds didn't put it out that caused the controversy. If that was all it was then I'd be on their side. It was that one of their players pretended he was going to put the ball out and then didn't. That's what makes it awful.
 
All his assumptions were wrong and it was so obvious he hadn't seen the game. Everyone is going on about playing to the whistle, to me the point was that Roberts was it? the Leeds player acted as though he was going to put the ball out, which was why the Villa players all stopped and then didn't. Sneaky in the extreme

Exactly, he made himself look an idiot. No one really pulled him up on it either and him trying to defend Bamford was embarrassing.
 
Also worth mentioning that they talk about the L**ds match shortly after us. Ian Wright makes himself look a tit who clearly didn't watch the L**ds v Villa game.

"The villa lad got back up and was fine" where did he get that info from? His best mate Patrick Bamford? Kodja went off injured and Villa had no striker.

Wrighty don't pretend like you watched the match or know anything about it. You were actually watching Arsenal getting spanked by Leicester and then getting moody about it on Twitter.
Wright is ok for England matches where passion doesn't look out of place on its own at times. In terms of actually understanding what is going on, I don't recall many insightful things from him. Certainly Neville, Carragher and Alex Scott can sleep easy knowing their jobs are safe.
 
What I don't get is that the Bamford 'thing' has nothing whatsoever to do with the goal or playing on. It wasn't an emotional response to the situation, it wasn't a 'heat of the moment' action - it was a cold, calculated act designed to get a payer sent off.

It wasn't passion, it was cheating - pure and simple.

How Ian Wright could be OK with that is beyond me. Unless that was how he played.
 
What I don't get is that the Bamford 'thing' has nothing whatsoever to do with the goal or playing on. It wasn't an emotional response to the situation, it wasn't a 'heat of the moment' action - it was a cold, calculated act designed to get a payer sent off.

It wasn't passion, it was cheating - pure and simple.

How Ian Wright could be OK with that is beyond me. Unless that was how he played.

This^^

why bamford hasn't been banned for at least 3 games is an absolute disgrace
 
I think the reason the Villa players were fuming, and no one seems to have picked up on this, is that Villa had put the ball out for Leeds not long before this incident.
 
Whichever programme has the big interview with Ollie, he talks about being a Burnley fan in that.
 



I have never really liked Adam, but he spoke a lot of sense on here. It was nice to listen to someone who could name a few of our players and where they play and our tactics. It always helps when they like us too.

While I agree that it's nice, it's the bare minimum in Adam's case: he's still a player for Stoke, so if he couldn't name a couple of players from the promotion team in his division it would have been pretty shameful.

I get your sentiment though as you feel that most pundits wouldn't be able to pick out any of our players (with the exception of Sharp) in a line-up :oops:
 
While I agree that it's nice, it's the bare minimum in Adam's case: he's still a player for Stoke, so if he couldn't name a couple of players from the promotion team in his division it would have been pretty shameful.

I get your sentiment though as you feel that most pundits wouldn't be able to pick out any of our players (with the exception of Sharp) in a line-up :oops:
Steve Basham’s quite well known.
 
It’s worth signing Adam, just so I can fit in a Charlie Adam size Adidas shirt next season
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom