Subs

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




Not when he's put 3 past their keeper, thought Mcgoldrick had a bad game, but everyone does at some point.
I'd like to see a bit more of Washington though, he's like a terrier, he's got abit of pace too.
 
Not when he's put 3 past their keeper, thought Mcgoldrick had a bad game, but everyone does at some point.
I'd like to see a bit more of Washington though, he's like a terrier, he's got abit of pace too.

McGoldrick played well in a new position and Washington has looked shit so far, apart from that you make a good point.
 
Thought Cook’s substitutions had more impact. 2 subs. 2 goals
Good to give Billy the chance to be applauded off. Thought McGoldrick did well in the Duffy role all things considered but good to give Couttsy half an hour.
 
McGoldrick played well in a new position and Washington has looked shit so far, apart from that you make a good point.

Think you’re being a bit harsh on Washington. Granted he hasn’t done much at all but he’s only played about 10 minutes spread over 7 games. I’m not saying he’ll be any good but give him chance to show that he’s ‘shit’ before you label him as such
 
Think you’re being a bit harsh on Washington. Granted he hasn’t done much at all but he’s only played about 10 minutes spread over 7 games. I’m not saying he’ll be any good but give him chance to show that he’s ‘shit’ before you label him as such

I’ve not said he’s shit, I’ve said he’s looked shit so far. I was slightly exaggerating to make a point that replacing McGoldrick with Washington doesn’t seem sensible based on form.
 
Not when he's put 3 past their keeper, thought Mcgoldrick had a bad game, but everyone does at some point.
Strange thought he was our second best player behind sharp. He chased players down, played some lovely passes, unfortunately missed a good shot but never would I say that was a bad preformance.
 
Strange thought he was our second best player behind sharp. He chased players down, played some lovely passes, unfortunately missed a good shot but never would I say that was a bad preformance.
Everyone has there own opinion, but I didn't think he did particularly well, some of his passes were wayward, he ran about alot, but it was more to make up for what he should've dealt with previously, he didn't really pose a threat upfront for me, but as I said, everyone has there own opinion. Thought Clarke had a good game, he's picking up abit now, shame he didn't score, had a couple of good chances.
I'd like to see Washington on with Sharp and/or Clarke, think that his pace and determination would cause problems. Still, a good game, much enjoyed, and, WERE TOP OF THE LEAGUE.
 



McGoldrick played well in a new position and Washington has looked shit so far, apart from that you make a good point.
How has Washington "looked shit so far"?, he's hardly played, he needs game time, I think he would suit the position Mcgoldrick played yesterday better, he's got pace and he gets stuck in to the opposition, think he deserves a chance.
 
Post some tits mate. It will have more sense than that opinion. :D

To be fair i though he didn't have a great game, he over hit some passes, gave the ball away a few times and sold a few players short with bad passes.
I was going to suggest Wilder game him a rest next.
Just goes to show how different we all see games sometimes.
 
How has Washington "looked shit so far"?, he's hardly played, he needs game time, I think he would suit the position Mcgoldrick played yesterday better, he's got pace and he gets stuck in to the opposition, think he deserves a chance.

Based on the fact he’s hardly played and had little impact when he has come on. To say he’s a better option than McGoldrick is a bit daft.
 
To be fair i though he didn't have a great game, he over hit some passes, gave the ball away a few times and sold a few players short with bad passes.
I was going to suggest Wilder game him a rest next.
Just goes to show how different we all see games sometimes.

Agreed, we do. I take into account that he was asked to play an unfamiliar role and managed it. As Billy has said in his interview, "he's a clever player". He naturally comes deep and well done to CW for appreciating he could do a job there. I hope he does have a rest before Nov 9th.
 
Based on the fact he’s hardly played and had little impact when he has come on. To say he’s a better option than McGoldrick is a bit daft.
Where did I say "he's a better option than Mcgoldrick"??
 
No McGoldrick is a good player, he's just not a Duffy replacement, but we have players who could be and we won't know until we've tried them , Washington and Johnson look to be players with quick feet and a touch of speed so why not give them a try in that position when Duffy comes off ?
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom