Oh well get the fucking razor blades out then
It's not a question of that, but it is a question of the spurious arguments and excuses people on here bring up to defend our results & elements of our performance. We fell apart against Derby 2nd half and we get the usual excuses, and again last night we've walked off the pitch drawing a game we should've won 3-1. I don't really give a flying monkey's where we were 504 days ago, what their wage bill is compared to ours or what Leon Clarke's inside leg measurement is. It's like Carlito's Way, Benny Blanco from the Bronx has to be dealt with at the time, regardless of how unpleasant it is and regardless of your history and desire to change. Because he wasn't and he gets more powerful and he kills you. There's two dogs, 1 fight. Simple as that.
You need to make hay while the sun shines and we're not. We're coming off the field needing to have made 100 bails, and we haven't and we're talking about how nice our 50 bails look, and how other farmers have been complimentary about the way we go about our bailing, and how the weather actually wasn't that warm as we're lead to believe, and the fact that this time last year we'd made 30 bails so we're actually improving and although the farmer in the next field has made his 100, it's because he's got a more expensive tractor and a better looking daughter. Bollocks. We had the workers in the field, the weather was good, we knew we needed to make 100 bails before day's end and we haven't.
There's the life lesson. Regardless of the other issues & points of fact, Derby have to beaten when we had the chance, Stoke had to be beaten when we had the chance. Because chances are come April next year, they'll be the ones in the mix, and we won't.
A competent professional footballer at this level should've put away the two changes that presented themselves 5 to 10 yards out last night in the 1st half, or at worst made the keeper make a save. We didn't.
A coaching set up as good as ours, after suffering the sucker punch on at least 10 occasions last year would've worked out a way of seeing out games in the last 10 to 20 minutes. We haven't and seem to be getting worse at it. In the 14 games so far; Swansea 2 goals in last 20 minutes, Bristol goal in the last 10 minutes, Preston 2 goals in the last 10 minutes, Derby last 13 minutes & last night last 2 minutes. CW can be as flippant as he wants.
At 65 mins on saturday and again last night we began to fade, at 70 mins in both games, we visible tired and our midfield was losing its potency, the opposition are playing higher up the pitch and the ball is coming back into the 3rd quarter of the pitch with alarming regularity. Due to this we start giving away free kicks, through tired fouls and last ditch tackles. Last nigh I had visions of us conceding a penalty late on.
The last 20 minute opposition surge is repeated game after game, after game. We do nothing to counter it. We seem unable or unwilling to radically change formation or style of play. Perhaps go 4-3-3, go direct and turn their defence, last night being an example of putting Johnson & Washington on wide either side and leaving either McG or LC in the middle, bring Duffy off and putting Coutts into a flat midfield 3 and hitting channels. Norwood was attempting to do that late last night, but didn't have the runners. The Stoke back 4 were running on fumes at the end, and it wasn't exploited. Williams at 34 looked like a boxer holding on in the last round.
If I was scouting our games, I'd say that we play the ball nicely without much threat, don't shoot from distance, don't have any pace upfront, don't have any real aerial threat and if the opposition are still in the game at 70 minutes they'll score. We'll have periods of 80% possession and not do anything with it.