I can't believe it

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




Dear me. :(

I can laugh and joke about just about most things (and Im sure you probably meant it as a throw away jokey comment) but some things i personally draw the line at.

That's fine.

Clearly. If I didn't just mean it as a throw away jokey comment I'd probably be serving life.

I don't really draw lines when it comes to jokes, it'd just be confusing. Laughing at a 9/11 joke one minute, getting offended at a holocaust joke the next. If it's funny it's funny. Just my view, but I genuinely do admire those who have a good moral compass.

Hitler did nothing wrong.
 
At the bottom of the glass , i can`t belive we sold Brooks for a measley 11.5 million .

When you look at how much better Norwood is in terms of impact, you could easily argue we have Bournemouth’s trousers down.

Paid less than £2m for proven quality, brought in a much larger sum for potential.
 
When you look at how much better Norwood is in terms of impact, you could easily argue we have Bournemouth’s trousers down.

Paid less than £2m for proven quality, brought in a much larger sum for potential.

If the fact was that the money we got from selling Brooks funded the signing of Norwood, it was a very good peice of business.

Brooks could have done some serious damage with Norwood behind him, but if it had to be one or the other I think we have the right one.
 
When you look at how much better Norwood is in terms of impact, you could easily argue we have Bournemouth’s trousers down.

Paid less than £2m for proven quality, brought in a much larger sum for potential.

Was just about to say this.

Arguably Norwood is an essential for our team to work whereas Brooks was a luxury offering. Not doubting that in 2 years time that 11.5m might look like we have had our pants down but for now, it feels like we have got the much better deal...
 
Was just about to say this.

Arguably Norwood is an essential for our team to work whereas Brooks was a luxury offering. Not doubting that in 2 years time that 11.5m might look like we have had our pants down but for now, it feels like we have got the much better deal...

I think in two years time we can look back and realise that the £12-15 Million enabled us to progress
 
So are we going to be having these riveting "Norwood cost £2m" threads after every game?
 
So are we going to be having these riveting "Norwood cost £2m" threads after every game?
As long as they are all 'Did he really cost ONLY £2m?', I will be happy to read them. Good news bears repeating.
 
I think we should shut up about the bargain price now , because we risk annoying the footy God's , who will either send him a freak injury or find a loophole in January.
 



That's fine.

Clearly. If I didn't just mean it as a throw away jokey comment I'd probably be serving life.

I don't really draw lines when it comes to jokes, it'd just be confusing. Laughing at a 9/11 joke one minute, getting offended at a holocaust joke the next. If it's funny it's funny. Just my view, but I genuinely do admire those who have a good moral compass.

Hitler did nothing wrong.

That's fair enough.

Not sure about the last comment though ;)
 
Was just about to say this.

Arguably Norwood is an essential for our team to work whereas Brooks was a luxury offering. Not doubting that in 2 years time that 11.5m might look like we have had our pants down but for now, it feels like we have got the much better deal...


I think in 3 or 4 years we'll get another pay day when Brooks moves onwards and upwards
 
I think in 3 or 4 years we'll get another pay day when Brooks moves onwards and upwards
Hope so but in my opinion just as likely to remain a luxury off the bench player. He has some issues to iron out for me.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom