rtifati
Worth silly money
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2013
- Messages
- 92
- Reaction score
- 177
Simple answer. JOC and Fleck are much more integral to the team than Brooks.
The difference is that if we received £10m for either JOC or Fleck, we could spend some of that to buy a competent centre half or centre midfielder. Not necessarily as good, but a competent replacement. Brooks is irreplaceable for a club in our position. He offers something totally different and it's not just his impact on the pitch - he changes the mood just by warming up.
If Wilder doesn't have to sell, and that's what he said recently, then this seems a baffling move. Brooks cost us nothing so no worries about our recouping investment, I doubt he's the highest earner at the club and he's on a four year deal. Sometimes with United it looks like we can't get rid fast enough.