Top pairing upfront..

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


Oh dear, if you'd prefer pictures of fellas lads, just ask!?
 
Juvenile prankster considers kerb-style humour to be something that everyone should enjoy.

I mean, if anyone disagrees why not suggest that they'd prefer a gay image, you know, just to make sure that we all know what's goin' on, uh?
 
Juvenile prankster considers kerb-style humour to be something that everyone should enjoy.

I mean, if anyone disagrees why not suggest that they'd prefer a gay image, you know, just to make sure that we all know what's goin' on, uh?
I hope your not suggesting, that, just because someone may or may not prefer to look at a picture of a fella, that he/she has to be gay!?
Seems a very narrow minded view......
 
I hope your not suggesting, that, just because someone may or may not prefer to look at a picture of a fella, that he/she has to be gay!?
Seems a very narrow minded view......

Ah, a weak attempt to flip the original post on it's head. So let's get this straight, you're the liberal poster who didn't suggest that other posters would prefer an image of men? I mean, I would hate to misrepresent, but you did write that so why the surprise faux outrage? Either stand by your words, or front up and confirm that's what you meant and that you're not ashamed that you made that comment?
 
I’m usually pro BigBed , however I’m not sure about this latest suggested signing :eek::eek:o_O
I thoughtfully, didn't attach a prefix to this thread, no "incoming", or "suggestion", I simply left it blank, as not to raise anyone's hopes.
Unfortunately, it seems some are so desperate for something to happen, they become quite grumpy about such threads.
 
Ah, a weak attempt to flip the original post on it's head. So let's get this straight, you're the liberal poster who didn't suggest that other posters would prefer an image of men? I mean, I would hate to misrepresent, but you did write that so why the surprise faux outrage? Either stand by your words, or front up and confirm that's what you meant and that you're not ashamed that you made that comment?
Stand up proudly by my words pal.
Did I say anything about anyone being gay, or was that your good self!??
Further to that, I am not ashamed of anything I have posted, I wasn't the one raising issues about people's sexuality, or making an issue of it.
 

Stand up proudly by my words pal.
Did I say anything about anyone being gay, or was that your good self!??
Further to that, I am not ashamed of anything I have posted, I wasn't the one raising issues about people's sexuality, or making an issue of it.

Disingenuous at best, stretching the truth and facts, well far even worser than worse. Post #5 implies that some posters might prefer images of men, well given your image of a woman with extraordinary sized breasts is meant to be there, for what reason I guess it doesn't take much to grasp.....and then you ask, probably with a gormless grin, in #8 that the reasons some posters might have a preference for images of men rather than women has nothing to do with their sexual preferences?
Oh yeah, that's why I choose to go to the cinema, because I have no interest in film, or because I read a book, because ideas and the written word is of no interest to me...........yeah pal, of course you were suggesting no such thing!
 
Disingenuous at best, stretching the truth and facts, well far even worser than worse. Post #5 implies that some posters might prefer images of men, well given your image of a woman with extraordinary sized breasts is meant to be there, for what reason I guess it doesn't take much to grasp.....and then you ask, probably with a gormless grin, in #8 that the reasons some posters might have a preference for images of men rather than women has nothing to do with their sexual preferences?
Oh yeah, that's why I choose to go to the cinema, because I have no interest in film, or because I read a book, because ideas and the written word is of no interest to me...........yeah pal, of course you were suggesting no such thing!

Without trying to be be patronising, I think we're discussing things that aren't really best debated on a football forum and things sometimes get out of hand like here. We're all Blades on here but that doesn't mean we're all going to agree on other stuff or even United. Would you agree mate?
 
Without trying to be be patronising, I think we're discussing things that aren't really best debated on a football forum and things sometimes get out of hand like here. We're all Blades on here but that doesn't mean we're all going to agree on other stuff or even United. Would you agree mate?

I would Booker, and in principle you're correct.

Let me attempt to throw some light on this. In no way do I seek to wish to 'correct' anyone's ideas about what's right, good, or acceptable, there's enough room in general chat for that to be addressed. But when there's a clear and undiluted attempt at doing something, then to have it backed up with a faux expression of surprise and resentment, well then you have to clearly point out that no matter what a poster says, there's an indisputable fact, of their creation, whose roots belong in the comic netherlands of the Light Programme (and for anyone unaware or unsure, that's the BBC before commercial radio got a grip on the attention spans of the listening public.
 
Can we not just agree that those funbags are bad and the OP should feel bad?

Gotta get better sauces if you wanna be in #TeamMeme
 
Problem with those is that it's very hard to provide the right type of support and if you overload at the top you may leave yourself exposed and very vulnerable at the back. Bouncebqckabilty is the key and that's a tall order when you are massive.
 
I would Booker, and in principle you're correct.

Let me attempt to throw some light on this. In no way do I seek to wish to 'correct' anyone's ideas about what's right, good, or acceptable, there's enough room in general chat for that to be addressed. But when there's a clear and undiluted attempt at doing something, then to have it backed up with a faux expression of surprise and resentment, well then you have to clearly point out that no matter what a poster says, there's an indisputable fact, of their creation, whose roots belong in the comic netherlands of the Light Programme (and for anyone unaware or unsure, that's the BBC before commercial radio got a grip on the attention spans of the listening public.
Fuck me, you’ve dedicated some thought to a light hearted post. Lighten up, for fucks sake. :)
 
Fuck me, you’ve dedicated some thought to a light hearted post. Lighten up, for fucks sake. :)

In your opinion.......funny how my right to comment is considered unworthy of posting. And this from the man who gave his solemn word to all and sundry about baring his arse to be posted on the forum then couldn't follow through. Alco, by all means disagree with what I write, but if you consider this appropriate posting seek help fella, seek help. ;)
 
Disingenuous at best, stretching the truth and facts, well far even worser than worse. Post #5 implies that some posters might prefer images of men, well given your image of a woman with extraordinary sized breasts is meant to be there, for what reason I guess it doesn't take much to grasp.....and then you ask, probably with a gormless grin, in #8 that the reasons some posters might have a preference for images of men rather than women has nothing to do with their sexual preferences?
Oh yeah, that's why I choose to go to the cinema, because I have no interest in film, or because I read a book, because ideas and the written word is of no interest to me...........yeah pal, of course you were suggesting no such thing!
Obviously your trying to deflect from the actual facts, that are, it was infact you, that brought up people's sexuality!?
So, does this mean you have a problem with people's sexuality??
Your coming across, as being extremely defensive over this??
You didn't need to comment on the thread in the first instance, you did, in which to provoke a response.
I responded as you required, but not in the way you were expecting.
(No grins by the way, I'm not 4!)
 
Obviously your trying to deflect from the actual facts, that are, it was infact you, that brought up people's sexuality!?
So, does this mean you have a problem with people's sexuality??
Your coming across, as being extremely defensive over this??
You didn't need to comment on the thread in the first instance, you did, in which to provoke a response.
I responded as you required, but not in the way you were expecting.
(No grins by the way, I'm not 4!)

There's arrogance for starters, thinking you knew what I'd expect.

I didn't post the image, I didn't ask other posters who disagreed if they're prefer you posted images of men, yet somehow you've taken a leap to avoid the central questions and prefer to use the limited info at your disposal and accuse me of something you yourself should be concerned about. Ok, no grins, but I see you didn't deny the gormlessness.
 
In your opinion.......funny how my right to comment is considered unworthy of posting. And this from the man who gave his solemn word to all and sundry about baring his arse to be posted on the forum then couldn't follow through. Alco, by all means disagree with what I write, but if you consider this appropriate posting seek help fella, seek help. ;)

You are entirely within your rights to post - just as I'm within my rights to point out that you've dedicated about ten lengthy, well considered posts objecting to a joke about a pair of tits. :D

and here you go again;

There's arrogance for starters, thinking you knew what I'd expect.

I didn't post the image, I didn't ask other posters who disagreed if they're prefer you posted images of men, yet somehow you've taken a leap to avoid the central questions and prefer to use the limited info at your disposal and accuse me of something you yourself should be concerned about. Ok, no grins, but I see you didn't deny the gormlessness.
 
There's arrogance for starters, thinking you knew what I'd expect.

I didn't post the image, I didn't ask other posters who disagreed if they're prefer you posted images of men, yet somehow you've taken a leap to avoid the central questions and prefer to use the limited info at your disposal and accuse me of something you yourself should be concerned about. Ok, no grins, but I see you didn't deny the gormlessness.
It's ok buddy, not all of us like big tits.
I understand you fancied some sort of argument or confrontation today, but unfortunately, I'm a happy soul today, and if you fail to see that this was a humorous thread, meant for light hearted replies, and not for the odd cantankerous individual to blow out of proportion, then that isn't my problem.
Obviously everyone has a different sense of humour, but trying to turn such things into finger pointing exercise or trying to provoke an argument isn't what's needed really.
 

You are entirely within your rights to post - just as I'm within my rights to point out that you've dedicated about ten lengthy, well considered posts objecting to a joke about a pair of tits. :D

and here you go again;
Why can't I like this more than once!!!???:p
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom