Incoming? Ryan Kent

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Kent won’t be coming, be good to have Clarke Kent upfront though.
 

Really don't like the sound of these "fines" if he doesn't play. Not the type of deal.we should be doing a d I'll be surprised if this happens. I personally hope it doesn't.
 
knowsnowt said:
Really don't like the sound of these "fines" if he doesn't play. Not the type of deal.we should be doing a d I'll be surprised if this happens. I personally hope it doesn't.
Click to expand...
Agree kn, if he turns up and it does t work out like his other loan we have to pay or leave a better option out.

One caveat is 'in Tuffty we trust'. Could be worse, Turry could be negotiating contracts.
 
knowsnowt said:
Really don't like the sound of these "fines" if he doesn't play. Not the type of deal.we should be doing a d I'll be surprised if this happens. I personally hope it doesn't.
Click to expand...

Blade56 said:
Agree kn, if he turns up and it does t work out like his other loan we have to pay or leave a better option out.

One caveat is 'in Tuffty we trust'. Could be worse, Turry could be negotiating contracts.
Click to expand...

this one would surprise me if it happens, just does not sound like a CW type deal, normally he is about players earning a place in the team being there on merit and not playing because we want to avoid fines, all seems a bit fishy.
 
Luke1993 said:
CW has always said he will never do a loan where they have to play. He won't be coming here if Liverpool are saying that
Click to expand...

Liverpool aren’t saying he must play though.

What they are saying is that the financial package/ cost is based on his appearances at his new club.
Remember they want him to get games, so if we don’t play him then we’ll have to pay them a little compensation which seems fair.

I suppose that when you have a youngster that’s highly sort of then you’ll have loads of interested clubs. Liverpool want to protect their interest and make sure the player is developed properly and gets some matches. Seems fair to put in these clauses, they’ll still have loads of interest even with the clauses and even if we don’t play him doubt it’’ll cost a massive amount.
 

Bladesthorpe said:
He's a magician with a bald head, ask your dad.:)
Click to expand...

davidnixonandbas.jpeg
 
Did he ever actually speak on tv - or maybe ours was just knackered :(
 
Roygbiv said:
Journalist. Usually more clued up about Wednesday in my experience. Said they were getting a German coach yesterday before the news of Ron Mael broke so he wasnt far off
Click to expand...
Who's Ron mel?


SHIT A BUCKET JUST GOT IT AS I POSTED. I'll give you that one Roy
 
Sheffsteel said:
Liverpool aren’t saying he must play though.

What they are saying is that the financial package/ cost is based on his appearances at his new club.
Remember they want him to get games, so if we don’t play him then we’ll have to pay them a little compensation which seems fair.

I suppose that when you have a youngster that’s highly sort of then you’ll have loads of interested clubs. Liverpool want to protect their interest and make sure the player is developed properly and gets some matches. Seems fair to put in these clauses, they’ll still have loads of interest even with the clauses and even if we don’t play him doubt it’’ll cost a massive amount.
Click to expand...

But what if said player is playing sh1te and gets dropped because he deserves to be dropped, perhaps said player should pay any compensation?

Ludicrous imo and may set a precedent in which kills the loan market where many lower league clubs won't be able to afford a so called built in financial compensation scheme

I stand by what I say. Tell these big clubs to fk off and let their future stars rot in the reserves. After all, it's not just the lower league clubs, struggling to survive that benefit from these loans. The player and the parent club also benefit
 
It's not totally unreasonable that Liverpool want to send him somewhere he'll get games.

Look at it like this, Liverpool are saying the fee is X quid, but we'll knock X quid off each time he plays....which is how united will have to look at it.
 
Valleyblade said:
It's not totally unreasonable that Liverpool want to send him somewhere he'll get games.

Look at it like this, Liverpool are saying the fee is X quid, but we'll knock X quid off each time he plays....which is how united will have to look at it.
Click to expand...

But he will only get games if hr merits a place in the side. What if he's playing shite?

A manager won't purposely drop a player if he is playing well and deserves to be there on merit

This scheme penalises the club by building in a penalty scheme when it may not be the club responsible for the loanee not getting a game
 
Turn it on it’s head and let us have him for free and we pay a fee every time he starts , come on as sub or is in the squad.
It’s similar to the bonus scheme for players but the club gets it.
 
I think we should be nowhere near this deal tbh.

The whole nonsense about penalties is ridiculous and he's a winger, isn't he? The only feasible position I can see for him playing in our formation is the one occupied by Duffy. Presumably, Liverpool wouldn't be happy with him coming off the bench every game? It would also mean Brook's done and dusted.
 

If we get Kent, do not be surprised to see Brooks sold, especially to Liverpool.

That's what makes me a bit sceptical about this deal. As well as the financial penalties. But he is a player I'd like us to sign.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Yogi
Player Suggestion Man United Pair
Replies
17
Views
2K
rompodebailey
R
mattbianco1
Player Suggestion EFL Targets for 2025/26
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
ancientblade
A
Yogi
Player Suggestion Djylian N’Guessan and Paul Eymard
Replies
2
Views
685
Yogi
Yogi
MayorOJC
Out of Contract Players
2 3
Replies
71
Views
6K
Ndiayewillalwaysloveyou
Ndiayewillalwaysloveyou
Shadota
  • Poll Poll
Potential PL Recruitment Strategies
3 4 5
Replies
131
Views
9K
54yrblade
5

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom