happyhippy
Well-Known Member
It has always been the case though, hasn't it? The only thing which makes it stick out even more is that two of the three mentioned are in the top flight. For years we've looked at the back page of the Green'Un and seen umpteen ex-Blades who scored that day.
I thought at the time that the Hulse deal was a good one, especially seeing as he hadn't scored a goal in his comeback season. Beattie's transfer was inevitable given his wage level at the time, and what his wage demands were alleged to be (I'm sure I read summat about £50k pw somewhere), and apart from that King Kev I said he wanted the wage bill trimming way before he was eventually sold..
Personally (given that we're all great at spending someone else's money), I'd have preferred to gamble, but then I would, being a gambling man. I suppose the problem might have been that if he had increased wages, it would have been even harder to sell at the end of the year if we didn't go up.
I thought Stead didn't get a real chance at the Lane in the end. Maybe that wasn't the right move for us to let him go. Not sure.
In any event, I still think that one deal was right, one was probably enforced, and one might have been the wrong one. I don't think there's any need for scathing attacks about them though.
I thought at the time that the Hulse deal was a good one, especially seeing as he hadn't scored a goal in his comeback season. Beattie's transfer was inevitable given his wage level at the time, and what his wage demands were alleged to be (I'm sure I read summat about £50k pw somewhere), and apart from that King Kev I said he wanted the wage bill trimming way before he was eventually sold..
Personally (given that we're all great at spending someone else's money), I'd have preferred to gamble, but then I would, being a gambling man. I suppose the problem might have been that if he had increased wages, it would have been even harder to sell at the end of the year if we didn't go up.
I thought Stead didn't get a real chance at the Lane in the end. Maybe that wasn't the right move for us to let him go. Not sure.
In any event, I still think that one deal was right, one was probably enforced, and one might have been the wrong one. I don't think there's any need for scathing attacks about them though.