Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Hmmm. I think that tells us all something about you, Solomon.i could concerntrate all my energy into watching quinn being shit instead.
it would mean that we wouldnt have the worst central midfielder in the league in our team, it would mean i wouldnt have to watch him being shit every week, i could concerntrate all my energy into watching quinn being shit instead.
it doesnt matter though, no one in their right mind would take him from us
it would mean that we wouldnt have the worst central midfielder in the league in our team, it would mean i wouldnt have to watch him being shit every week, i could concerntrate all my energy into watching quinn being shit instead.
it doesnt matter though, no one in their right mind would take him from us
Who knows?
A number of teams have enquired about him in the past.
Pitty we didn't accept any offers.
I think if we used money we got for him we could easily replace him. So I am going to say yes we would be better off.
Although I cant see people paying money for Monty to be honest.
I meant instantly.
If Nick Montgomery did not play on Saturday - would we be better, play better and win?
If Nick Montgomery did not play on Saturday - would we be better, play better and win?
YES!!!!!!!!
We have not had a midfield for years, HE is the main problem.
Im not saying its all down to him, I dont think we need anyone on that position (defensive midfield). We are 'supposedly' one of the better teams in this league, at home why do we base our formation around the other team? We should be playing with two creative midfielders and leeting the other team worry about us.
I know they were both only on the pitch for 5 minutes but wth Howard and Hendrie on the pitch there was someone wanting the ball in midfield, an option for thr defenders to pass to (Monty was still on the pitch though, I think).
If Blackwell insists on playing this formation could we have someone who has at leat an ounce of ability?
Please?
Would getting rid of Monty provide an instant turn around in our fortunes?
Yes or no?
I have so much more respect for Montgomery when I hear what people say about him.
Last night, he was getting slagged to shit, but continued to work hard and trying to do something for the team. The rest of the team dissappeared and hid away, but no, Montgomery kept going, and going and going.
He knows himself he's not the best technical player at the club, he never will be, but at least he shows a bit of fight and determination to do well and create something because nobody else had the bottle to step up to the plate and try it.
Away from home, he's brilliant. He doesn't have to be flashy, he can just sit in front of the back 4 and win the ball back with no pressure from the fans. At home, he's asked to push forward but he's not quite got the technical ability to do it. Plus of course the additional pressure of fans moaning at him no matter what he does.
I agree with him and I've been very critical of Monty over the years.A good assessment there Daz.
Some will not agree but there you go. Until we get better players he will have a role.
No selling montys not the answer.
Id sooner have a team of tryers than a team of can play wont play.
got to look at the tactics and manager
Even if the players did hear some of the dissent aimed towards them, who's to say that it won't improve the way they play? No one knows, and for someone to make a statement such as 'booing doesn't help' is a little arrogant. For all you know, it might spur them on to improve their game.
No one knows, and for someone to make a statement such as 'booing doesn't help' is a little arrogant. For all you know, it might spur them on to improve their game.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?