I'm surprised at the attitude of some, given the approbation towards MK Dons when they did not give us all the seats we deserved
A somewhat different situation, though.
MK Dons have a ground that holds 30,000 and rarely attract above 7,000 home fans.
We have a ground where, if you exclude the Lane End, there are approximately 23,500 seats with what can be considered a 'good' view: 7,500 in the South, 9,000 on the Kop, 2,000 in the South/Lane end corner and 5,000 in the John Street. At present, we can count on a consistent home demand, even for unattractive games, of 23-24,000 per match. For the more attractive fixtures it will be higher.
If we hand the Lane end over to away fans, we are effectively forcing our own fans into rubbish (often restricted view) seats. Why should our own fans, in our own ground, have to sit behind posts on the Kop or on the South side of the Kop where the view includes 2 stanchions obscuring different parts of the pitch, or sit in the bottom corner of the John Street or South Stand, when there are fantastic viewing seats in the Bramall Lane upper?
I know fans who have passed on attending matches in the past because the only tickets remaining in the home stands, when the Lane upper and lower was given to away fans, were 'restricted view' for 25 sheets upwards. You can hardly blame them. Moreover, I believe the club are aware of this and that is why they are now doing what they are doing with the Lane end and it is absolutely the right thing to do.
And that's before we even get into questions about the effect that having a whole end of away fans (in the stand - Lane end upper - with the best acoustics in the ground) has on the atmosphere when we want home games to be proper 'home games', to help the team win more matches.