Goalkeeper

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

I'd be happy with that. There's every chance he'd get in our first team, and he seems to be a good character.
 

Like him n rate him, could do a lot worse!!!!!..............GL.
 
Yep, Ramsdale for a year would do me as well.

He's had a good summer and I'd be far more confident having him as cover for Moore than Long or pretty much every other keeper Utd have been linked with over summer with the exception of Etheridge.

He's also obviously still in touch with a lot of the other lads and he was sat/stood near us at Oxford supporting the team shortly after his move to Bournemouth.
 
We have no money,yet we are signing Lundstrom,can you explain how that works?

Who needs an explanation when you have an agenda? You really don't get this Fred, do you?

The money we're spending and offers we have in for Leonard and Linehan are not to be taken seriously. It's an elaborate sham by our evil board to give the illusion of ambition.

That naive fucker Tufty has been taken in just like the rest of us. Only a select few know the reality, including open revolt, led by the captain, in the dressing room and Tufty chinning the Prince.
 
Both 'sides of the camp' are right though Pinchy. We'd better be spending some money given the 5-6m in sell on fees we are about to bank.

If you read the article in the Star you will have seen that since the premiership started we have made a net 15m from transfer dealings. So you can see where the cynicism comes from. However it is clear that McCabe has bankrolled the on going deficit between income and expenditure and that has cost him a lot of money.

The 'issue for some now is we have a Saudi Prince who implied he'd 'invest when we got into the championship and we will have another summer where transfer income exceeds expenditure. That's the life of a Blade and I think we are building a very handy squad but it would be nice to see one 'wow signing....maybe that's gonna be whoever we get 'up top'
 
Would just underline the absolute futility of letting him go for a pittance when we couldn't replace him to the same standard for a decent saving to make brining in he £1m fee worthwhile.

Didn't Ramsdale's contract finish in June (which meant he could walk and we'd get even more of a pittance from a tribunal)?
 
Who needs an explanation when you have an agenda? You really don't get this Fred, do you?

The money we're spending and offers we have in for Leonard and Linehan are not to be taken seriously. It's an elaborate sham by our evil board to give the illusion of ambition.

That naive fucker Tufty has been taken in just like the rest of us. Only a select few know the reality, including open revolt, led by the captain, in the dressing room and Tufty chinning the Prince.

I have noticed that i have not received a reply to the point i made
 
I will welcome Ramsdale back. His recent England appearances and successes might just keep Moore "on his toes" should his own form dip and obviously provide insurance against injury to Moore.

Now that Bournemouth have signed Begovic, they may sell Ramsdale back to us for next season in the Premiership at the end of the forthcoming season.
 
I will welcome Ramsdale back. His recent England appearances and successes might just keep Moore "on his toes" should his own form dip and obviously provide insurance against injury to Moore.

Now that Bournemouth have signed Begovic, they may sell Ramsdale back to us for next season in the Premiership at the end of the forthcoming season.

Always thought it was an odd move for Ramsdale to go to the prem - he clearly isn't going to play (as begovic is a multi million pound first team keeper for the long run)

For his career, he would have stood a better chance of displacing Moore here - he'd get first team football sooner and could then get a move to a prem side where he would be more likely to go around as first choice .

Can't see him doing anything other than floating around on loan for the next 4-5 years.

Even then it's not gonna benefit himif he's not a first choice when on loan
 
Always thought it was an odd move for Ramsdale to go to the prem - he clearly isn't going to play (as begovic is a multi million pound first team keeper for the long run)

For his career, he would have stood a better chance of displacing Moore here - he'd get first team football sooner and could then get a move to a prem side where he would be more likely to go around as first choice .

Can't see him doing anything other than floating around on loan for the next 4-5 years.

Even then it's not gonna benefit himif he's not a first choice when on loan
Me too, particularly Bournemouth, where I would expect the coaching for young players to be at most on a par with the Lane. Maybe he was promised chances of the first team in the near future, which now does not look like it will materialise any time soon?

Agents can play a big part in the process and if he has a bad one, may have been badly advised in the name of money.
 

Always thought it was an odd move for Ramsdale to go to the prem - he clearly isn't going to play (as begovic is a multi million pound first team keeper for the long run)

For his career, he would have stood a better chance of displacing Moore here - he'd get first team football sooner and could then get a move to a prem side where he would be more likely to go around as first choice .

Can't see him doing anything other than floating around on loan for the next 4-5 years.

Even then it's not gonna benefit himif he's not a first choice when on loan

He went from being on not very much money to a hell of a lot of money.

I'm making up the numbers to some extent here but it's a brave man (in any career) who decides to stick on £30,000 a year when he's being offered £200,000 a year elsewhere because he thinks it's a better move in the long term.

I'd also say it's a brave / stupid football club who makes any attempt to match those sort of wage increases for any player with potential.
 
No it wouldn't.

More nonsense.

£1m isn't a lot of money these days.

We had a strong prospect on not a lot of money (ok - we may have had to offer him a new contract)

But another teams first team keeper (one good enough to challenge Moore etc) would be on a hell of a lot more money over a three year contract. When you add that to the cost of signing them up or a decent loan fee and paying a premier leagues reserves wages. There is not a lot of change left from the million quid we brought in by selling him.

But not least cos we actually need a player in his position.

To me this is a move that hasn't really benefitted the club or the player - I know we may have needed to sell financially but it would have been nice to keep him since we need a second choice keeper and looked good for promotion in January!
 
£1m isn't a lot of money these days.

We had a strong prospect on not a lot of money (ok - we may have had to offer him a new contract)

But another teams first team keeper (one good enough to challenge Moore etc) would be on a hell of a lot more money over a three year contract. When you add that to the cost of signing them up or a decent loan fee and paying a premier leagues reserves wages. There is not a lot of change left from the million quid we brought in by selling him.

But not least cos we actually need a player in his position.

To me this is a move that hasn't really benefitted the club or the player - I know we may have needed to sell financially but it would have been nice to keep him since we need a second choice keeper and looked good for promotion in January!

He would not sign a new contract,money in January or zilch in June,the club did the right thing
 
He would not sign a new contract,money in January or zilch in June,the club did the right thing

Genuinely didn't realise he had refused to sign a contract - If that's the case £1m quid is pretty decent business (you can never be sure at tribunals what you'll get.)

Still feel the lad has been poorly advised if that's the case - string of lower league loan moves and no PL appearances awaits him. If he's stayed here was every chance he could have been our first choice (on first choice championship wages) in the next 18 months or so and would have attracted interest from clubs then - with a realistic prospect of going into the PL as a first choice - on huge wages.
 
£1m isn't a lot of money these days.

We had a strong prospect on not a lot of money (ok - we may have had to offer him a new contract)

But another teams first team keeper (one good enough to challenge Moore etc) would be on a hell of a lot more money over a three year contract. When you add that to the cost of signing them up or a decent loan fee and paying a premier leagues reserves wages. There is not a lot of change left from the million quid we brought in by selling him.

But not least cos we actually need a player in his position.

To me this is a move that hasn't really benefitted the club or the player - I know we may have needed to sell financially but it would have been nice to keep him since we need a second choice keeper and looked good for promotion in January!


He would have left for nothing (apart from a tribunal fee) next summer if Utd had not sold him. With that in mind, £1m + add-ons for a player that's made 2 appearances for the club is pretty good business IMHO.

If he does return, the cost of a loan fee (if applicable) plus a % of his wages will undoubtedly amount to far less than £1m.
 
He would have left for nothing (apart from a tribunal fee) next summer if Utd had not sold him. With that in mind, £1m + add-ons for a player that's made 2 appearances for the club is pretty good business IMHO.

If he does return, the cost of a loan fee (if applicable) plus a % of his wages will undoubtedly amount to far less than £1m.

Burnley did quite well from a tribunal.....

"On 8 June 2015, Liverpool announced that they had agreed on personal terms with Ings, subject to a medical, as well as a developmental fee due to Burnley for players under 24, to be negotiated between two clubs or determined by a tribunal. Under tribunal the fee would be decided by the Professional Football Compensation Committee. On 28 April 2016, the saga was finally settled. Liverpool would pay Burnley a record fee for a tribunal hearing: £6.5 million up front, with an extra £1.5 million in player performance-related bonuses. Burnley will also receive 20% of any future fee should Liverpool sell the striker."

20% of any sell on. Wish we'd had that with Kyle walker.
 
Burnley did quite well from a tribunal.....

"On 8 June 2015, Liverpool announced that they had agreed on personal terms with Ings, subject to a medical, as well as a developmental fee due to Burnley for players under 24, to be negotiated between two clubs or determined by a tribunal. Under tribunal the fee would be decided by the Professional Football Compensation Committee. On 28 April 2016, the saga was finally settled. Liverpool would pay Burnley a record fee for a tribunal hearing: £6.5 million up front, with an extra £1.5 million in player performance-related bonuses. Burnley will also receive 20% of any future fee should Liverpool sell the striker."

20% of any sell on. Wish we'd had that with Kyle walker.
That was Danny Ings. A proven premier league striker. For £8m. Less than Rhodes.
 
We'd get more than a million for Brooks.

Wendy will do similarly well from a tribunal for Hirst if his dad tells him he's not signing a new contact.
 

No love lost between Hirst and Wednesday, can see him going and it will be interesting to see how much they get as he should be valued at similar to DCL, subsequently gives us an opportunity to see how good or bad a job we did with him.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom