Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
nearly 2 months he was their first signingHe's just been told they've signed Begovic? they signed him over a month ago I think.
We have no money,yet we are signing Lundstrom,can you explain how that works?
Would just underline the absolute futility of letting him go for a pittance when we couldn't replace him to the same standard for a decent saving to make brining in he £1m fee worthwhile.
Didn't Ramsdale's contract finish in June (which meant he could walk and we'd get even more of a pittance from a tribunal)?
Who needs an explanation when you have an agenda? You really don't get this Fred, do you?
The money we're spending and offers we have in for Leonard and Linehan are not to be taken seriously. It's an elaborate sham by our evil board to give the illusion of ambition.
That naive fucker Tufty has been taken in just like the rest of us. Only a select few know the reality, including open revolt, led by the captain, in the dressing room and Tufty chinning the Prince.
I will welcome Ramsdale back. His recent England appearances and successes might just keep Moore "on his toes" should his own form dip and obviously provide insurance against injury to Moore.
Now that Bournemouth have signed Begovic, they may sell Ramsdale back to us for next season in the Premiership at the end of the forthcoming season.
Me too, particularly Bournemouth, where I would expect the coaching for young players to be at most on a par with the Lane. Maybe he was promised chances of the first team in the near future, which now does not look like it will materialise any time soon?Always thought it was an odd move for Ramsdale to go to the prem - he clearly isn't going to play (as begovic is a multi million pound first team keeper for the long run)
For his career, he would have stood a better chance of displacing Moore here - he'd get first team football sooner and could then get a move to a prem side where he would be more likely to go around as first choice .
Can't see him doing anything other than floating around on loan for the next 4-5 years.
Even then it's not gonna benefit himif he's not a first choice when on loan
I'd love Speroni just so we can sing "tracksuit from Matalan"
I remember thefans singing it to him a few years ago and to be fair to him he was laughing all over his faceThat was Kiraly wasn't it?
Jamal Blackman from Chelsea?
Played a lot for Wycombe last season. Sort of player we'd look at.
Good move for the lad, if he isn't arsed about being paid.Looks like it might have been him. https://lionofviennasuite.sbnation....t-sheffield-united-to-sign-chelsea-goalkeeper
Always thought it was an odd move for Ramsdale to go to the prem - he clearly isn't going to play (as begovic is a multi million pound first team keeper for the long run)
For his career, he would have stood a better chance of displacing Moore here - he'd get first team football sooner and could then get a move to a prem side where he would be more likely to go around as first choice .
Can't see him doing anything other than floating around on loan for the next 4-5 years.
Even then it's not gonna benefit himif he's not a first choice when on loan
Probably took a look at Moore and then Howard and couldn't sign for Bolton quick enough!Good move for the lad, if he isn't arsed about being paid.
No it wouldn't.Would just underline the absolute futility of letting him go for a pittance when we couldn't replace him to the same standard for a decent saving to make brining in he £1m fee worthwhile.
No it wouldn't.
More nonsense.
£1m isn't a lot of money these days.
We had a strong prospect on not a lot of money (ok - we may have had to offer him a new contract)
But another teams first team keeper (one good enough to challenge Moore etc) would be on a hell of a lot more money over a three year contract. When you add that to the cost of signing them up or a decent loan fee and paying a premier leagues reserves wages. There is not a lot of change left from the million quid we brought in by selling him.
But not least cos we actually need a player in his position.
To me this is a move that hasn't really benefitted the club or the player - I know we may have needed to sell financially but it would have been nice to keep him since we need a second choice keeper and looked good for promotion in January!
He would not sign a new contract,money in January or zilch in June,the club did the right thing
£1m isn't a lot of money these days.
We had a strong prospect on not a lot of money (ok - we may have had to offer him a new contract)
But another teams first team keeper (one good enough to challenge Moore etc) would be on a hell of a lot more money over a three year contract. When you add that to the cost of signing them up or a decent loan fee and paying a premier leagues reserves wages. There is not a lot of change left from the million quid we brought in by selling him.
But not least cos we actually need a player in his position.
To me this is a move that hasn't really benefitted the club or the player - I know we may have needed to sell financially but it would have been nice to keep him since we need a second choice keeper and looked good for promotion in January!
He would have left for nothing (apart from a tribunal fee) next summer if Utd had not sold him. With that in mind, £1m + add-ons for a player that's made 2 appearances for the club is pretty good business IMHO.
If he does return, the cost of a loan fee (if applicable) plus a % of his wages will undoubtedly amount to far less than £1m.
That was Danny Ings. A proven premier league striker. For £8m. Less than Rhodes.Burnley did quite well from a tribunal.....
"On 8 June 2015, Liverpool announced that they had agreed on personal terms with Ings, subject to a medical, as well as a developmental fee due to Burnley for players under 24, to be negotiated between two clubs or determined by a tribunal. Under tribunal the fee would be decided by the Professional Football Compensation Committee. On 28 April 2016, the saga was finally settled. Liverpool would pay Burnley a record fee for a tribunal hearing: £6.5 million up front, with an extra £1.5 million in player performance-related bonuses. Burnley will also receive 20% of any future fee should Liverpool sell the striker."
20% of any sell on. Wish we'd had that with Kyle walker.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?