Wilder's new deal...

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




It would most definitely be the signing of the summer.

When you think back to the squad he inherited progress we've made as a club over the last year, it's hard not to think that Wilder is the club's greatest asset.

The rapport with the fans, the style of play, the team spirit, the tenacity of the players, everything is looking good, mainly in thanks to Wilder.
 
Why does he need more money? He got a wage rise when he joined and signed a 3 year deal didn't he?
A wage rise to £200,000 a year, half that we were paying Nigel Adkins.

Wouldn't you give him a big pay rise after the subsequent phenomenal success? We'll lose him otherwise, despite the over confidence of far too many people.
 
A wage rise to £200,000 a year, half that we were paying Nigel Adkins.

Wouldn't you give him a big pay rise after the subsequent phenomenal success? We'll lose him otherwise, despite the over confidence of far too many people.
How do you know what we were paying Adkins?
 



It's a topic that needs consideration. Most of us regard Wilder as crucial to any progress we make in the short to midterm, and the suggestion that he either doesn't need, or deserve, a pay rise is immaterial to what paying him will do for the Blades. Letting Wilder know he's wanted is a self-evident statement of intent. I'm not talking a ridiculous figure like a 10-year contract, but certainly a hefty rise on his current salary and an increase in the length of his agreement.

I may be wrong but I seem to recall that we're supposed to be paying Brayford £10 thousand a week? And yet Wilder's new agreement offers him £4K a week? If that's close to correct then something is wrong. Whatever the reasons, the pros and cons, without Wilder we'd almost certainly still be considering which Division 1 ground we'd be visiting this coming season. It was Wilder that signed almost a new team, yet we value him at £4K per week? I hope I'm wrong, but if that figure is correct we will, at some point, get gazumped and not know what hit us.
 
It's a topic that needs consideration. Most of us regard Wilder as crucial to any progress we make in the short to midterm, and the suggestion that he either doesn't need, or deserve, a pay rise is immaterial to what paying him will do for the Blades. Letting Wilder know he's wanted is a self-evident statement of intent. I'm not talking a ridiculous figure like a 10-year contract, but certainly a hefty rise on his current salary and an increase in the length of his agreement.

I may be wrong but I seem to recall that we're supposed to be paying Brayford £10 thousand a week? And yet Wilder's new agreement offers him £4K a week? If that's close to correct then something is wrong. Whatever the reasons, the pros and cons, without Wilder we'd almost certainly still be considering which Division 1 ground we'd be visiting this coming season. It was Wilder that signed almost a new team, yet we value him at £4K per week? I hope I'm wrong, but if that figure is correct we will, at some point, get gazumped and not know what hit us.
You're right what he's achieved he should be the highest paid at the club.
 
You're right what he's achieved he should be the highest paid at the club.
Is any manager in the world the highest paid? Chelsea,Man u, city, real, barca? Etc. No way near, not saying whether Wilder should or shouldn't but it doesn't work that way, I am sure Wilder and Knill will get an offer they are both happy with, keep the faith, onwards and upwards
 
....Yep! Nyron is back

IMG_0196.JPG

Pic should actually show 2 x 50p, assuming that one of them would refer to what we were prepared to pay him (for cheap laughs).

Poor Nyron. Of all the "not really footballers" we saw at the Lane in the decade of decline before Wilder, I think Nyron remains one of the most bonky mad.
 
Players bring all the TV money in with most of the other sums of money and this is one of the reasons that players will always get more money than the managers.

Another reason is that players also put more effort in physically meaning their careers end relatively early whereas a manager can manage for any amount of years really not needing the money in such a short space of time.

That's two theories anyway and if you don't agree with them then put them in the Jags thread with the rest of the bollocks. :)
 
It's a topic that needs consideration. Most of us regard Wilder as crucial to any progress we make in the short to midterm, and the suggestion that he either doesn't need, or deserve, a pay rise is immaterial to what paying him will do for the Blades. Letting Wilder know he's wanted is a self-evident statement of intent. I'm not talking a ridiculous figure like a 10-year contract, but certainly a hefty rise on his current salary and an increase in the length of his agreement.

I may be wrong but I seem to recall that we're supposed to be paying Brayford £10 thousand a week? And yet Wilder's new agreement offers him £4K a week? If that's close to correct then something is wrong. Whatever the reasons, the pros and cons, without Wilder we'd almost certainly still be considering which Division 1 ground we'd be visiting this coming season. It was Wilder that signed almost a new team, yet we value him at £4K per week? I hope I'm wrong, but if that figure is correct we will, at some point, get gazumped and not know what hit us.

Tha 'rong A
 



Is any manager in the world the highest paid? Chelsea,Man u, city, real, barca? Etc. No way near, not saying whether Wilder should or shouldn't but it doesn't work that way, I am sure Wilder and Knill will get an offer they are both happy with, keep the faith, onwards and upwards

Wenger is at Arsenal
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom