I'll be amazed if this isn't overturned. For a judge to sit there and say that beyond doubt, if one player hadn't been playing West Ham would have got at least 3 less points is crazy, and just opens up the whole sport to a multitude of lawsuits after virtually every game.
Where would it end? Watford suing Reading for the goal that never was?
Hull suing Newcastle for Guthries challenge on whats his face the other day?
Teams suing each other after each game for professional fouls that deny goals?
Still, if the WHU board were stupid enough to continue to lie after getting off lightly for their original stupidity then they deserve hanging from a lamp post at the junction of Green St and Barking Road.
Mind, if Tevez earn't us 3 extra points in the last three games, how about all the points we didn't get whilst he was playing earlier in the season, and therefore keeping Marlon 'goal machine' Harewood out of the first XI!