pommpey
THE FUTURE ... AS IT USED TO BE
- Banned
- #181
Link to McCabe saying that? Please.![]()
http://www.viewfromthejohnstreet.co...g-blades-faltering-league-one-promotion-hopes
pommpey
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Link to McCabe saying that? Please.![]()
Sanguine?
sanguine
ˈsaŋɡwɪn/
adjective
- 1.
optimistic or positive, especially in an apparently bad or difficult situation.
"he is sanguine about prospects for the global economy"
synonyms: optimistic, bullish, hopeful, buoyant, positive, disposed to look on the bright side, confident, cheerful, cheery, bright, assured; More
Shome mishtake shurely?
That was very true, Bert did hear that on Radio Sheffield. It was probably pommpey.
Yeah. Are we talking about the fucking awful start to the season where we lost three out of four (including two on our super-investment Desso pitch, or the recent blip which everyone was expecting?
And, I'm surprised you had to look that up, lad.
pommpey
So everyone can see what we're dealing with......
"The results and league position never lies, no matter how many games you see.
Snitty asides don't contribute jack shit to the debate. United are rock bottom."
pommpey
Three posts earlier.....
"And Bert reminds pommpey of some sad old duffer dribbling in the corner with nowt much to contribute, whom the people in the room simply humour.
Drink your Horlicks now, eh?"
pommpey
Hey was that when I made the comment about us emulating Blackpool which Sean Thornton searched for and his pet poodle Tunstall the stalker or whatever name he uses this week likes to quoteAw. Poor Bert. I'm sure he needs you to prop up his wounded third-party ego, and the rest of the board to tut and say 'aw'.
As said, Bert couldn't offer much as to why we'd started the season so poorly. We'd lost three in four (and again, two at home on our wonderful super-investment pitch) and Bert was busy pissing his pants just in case this was indeed 'the end'.
Fortunately Wilder has turned it round and credit to him and the playing staff we have retained, not to you and Bert.
pommpey
Aw. Poor Bert. I'm sure he needs you to prop up his wounded third-party ego, and the rest of the board to tut and say 'aw'.
As said, Bert couldn't offer much as to why we'd started the season so poorly. We'd lost three in four (and again, two at home on our wonderful super-investment pitch) and Bert was busy pissing his pants just in case this was indeed 'the end'.
Fortunately Wilder has turned it round and credit to him and the playing staff we have retained, not to you and Bert.
pommpey
Hey was that when I made the comment about us emulating Blackpool which Sean Thornton searched for and his pet poodle Tunstall the stalker or whatever name he uses this week likes to quote![]()
I'm not angry about this season. I am disappointed in previous failures to get out of the division where we are long overdue some success, and similarly disappointed people don't see the damage people like McCabe has done since we dropped out of the PL with shit appointments, puzzling player floggings and odd acquisitions. I'll be very disappointed if, after all the shit the club and its fans have had to endure, season upon season, him and HRH don't fulfill their pledge and give us Game Changing Investments, so we can 'think Liverpool'.
As it were.
pommpey
Hey was that when I made the comment about us emulating Blackpool which Sean Thornton searched for and his pet poodle Tunstall the stalker or whatever name he uses this week likes to quote![]()
And presumably you believe it all.
So that's okay then.
pommpey
At the time Bert pointed out to all you wrist slitters that it would take time due to a new manager, new players and new tactics.As said, Bert couldn't offer much as to why we'd started the season so poorly.
Bert was busy pissing his pants just in case this was indeed 'the end'.
If Murphy wasn't sold to help fund the earlier purchase of the Desso, surely we would have reinvested the money we received from selling Murphy on new players? Since we didn't do that it is a logical conclusion that the money was used to alleviate (and then some, £1m spend vs £1.75m sale) the spend on the Desso.The Desso installation was first announced in April 2014, being paid for by the Cup runs under Clough. Murphy was sold some sixteen months later.
You quoted from it.
Why does pommpey always seem so angry?
If Murphy wasn't sold to help fund the earlier purchase of the Desso, surely we would have reinvested the money we received from selling Murphy on new players? Since we didn't do that it is a logical conclusion that the money was used to alleviate (and then some, £1m spend vs £1.75m sale) the spend on the Desso.
Oh dear.How many times?
McCabe said the Murphy money would be re-invested and it was; on wages.
There are countless threads (that I certainly can't be arsed to look for) that moan about this. Typically the 'antis' forget or (deliberately ignore), the fact that wages are so high and massively eclipse transfer fees over the life of a player's contract. They want all 'fees in' to be spent on new players.
When pushed as to who funds the wages, the final answer is usually that it's McCabe's own fault for stepping forward to be Chairman.
Somehow he should 'put more in'
or the magic money tree,
or elves,
or the tooth fairy.
It is nothing to do with the Desso.
If Murphy wasn't sold to help fund the earlier purchase of the Desso, surely we would have reinvested the money we received from selling Murphy on new players? Since we didn't do that it is a logical conclusion that the money was used to alleviate (and then some, £1m spend vs £1.75m sale) the spend on the Desso.
Oh dear.
It doesn't matter whether it went on wages or the Desso, the net result is still the same.
If a man spends £10 on apples (desso) and £10 on pears (players wages), then sells his bananas (Murphy) for £10, it doesn't matter whether he says the £10 he got from his bananas covered his apples or his pears, the fact is he's saved an extra £10; which he wouldn't have done had he reinvested it on more oranges (new players).
Hope that helps.
Oh dear.
It doesn't matter whether it went on wages or the Desso, the net result is still the same.
If a man spends £10 on apples (desso) and £10 on pears (players wages), then sells his bananas (Murphy) for £10, it doesn't matter whether he says the £10 he got from his bananas covered his apples or his pears, the fact is he's saved an extra £10; which he wouldn't have done had he reinvested it on more oranges (new players).
Hope that helps.
He is -10. -20 had he reinvested the incoming 10. Hence the saving of 10.The man is down £10 is he not,spent £20,£10 incoming,difference of £10
f a man spends £10 on apples (desso) and £10 on pears (players wages), then sells his bananas (Murphy) for £10, it doesn't matter whether he says the £10 he got from his bananas covered his apples or his pears, the fact is he's saved an extra £10; which he wouldn't have done had he reinvested it on more oranges (new players).
Hope that helps.
Load of irrelevant waffleIt does help.
So basically you are saying nothing should be spent on any infrastructure improvements. ALL income must be ploughed back into wages transfer/ fees?
So in ten years time when BDTBL is the new 'Stadium of rust', you can start a thread about 'Why doesn't McCabe spend money on the ground?'
I am losing the will to live with this thread.
Perhaps have a word with Pommpey to see who claims the internet arguement cup for this one.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?