Clarke and Sharp + other bits

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

ThatJa

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
6,049
Reaction score
9,396
Location
Gleadless
Too similar types of players, which got me thinking...

Either we need to play the system we play now (as much as people hate long ball) but we need a pacey striker alongside either Clarke or Sharp (both can't play together in this system imo) but that means one of either being on the bench, i can't see us spending money to have Clarke sit on the bench, and there is no way in hell Sharp will be benched, hes captain after all. So this longball probably won't work with the set of players we have.

The other option could be, 4-3-3? If we have Clarke (as a target man) and Sharp holding the ball up for a pacey striker (even McNulty to a certain extent) with Sharp drifting out wide more it may work out, we'd be light in numbers in Midfield and would more than likely have less of the ball, but if we get Morsy or someone competent like him we should have enough Quality in midfield to make things happen..

Regarding Basham, I know Wilder came in and his first conversation with Basham was about where Basham thought his best position was, and he said Center mid... I just think we need to stick Basham at the back again, even if its just until we get a replacement.

Other things to note from me today, Scougall is still too lightweight and being as small as he is, he won't fit into the style of football we've been playing.

One other observation, Long needs to be given a break, for his own good. We have a very impatient fanbase (expectedly) and it won't do him any favours. He's made a lot of mistakes in the past 2 seasons and the more he makes the worse it will get for him. I would like to see Ramsdale in goal on Tuesday.
 



T

One other observation, Long needs to be given a break, for his own good. We have a very impatient fanbase (expectedly) and it won't do him any favours. He's made a lot of mistakes in the past 2 seasons and the more he makes the worse it will get for him. I would like to see Ramsdale in goal on Tuesday.

seen Sunjihi 's post on lee Grant? He's very accurate in his predictions, there's only one fruitcake on here who is obsessed with denying that fact.
 
Too similar types of players, which got me thinking...

Disagree, don't think they are similar at all. One chases everything and comes alive in the box, the other jumps (dare i say it) like Sammon and looks laboured. I think/hope Clarke will come good and forge a good understanding with Sharp, early days and plenty of graft on the training ground is required.
 
One other observation, Long needs to be given a break, for his own good. We have a very impatient fanbase (expectedly) and it won't do him any favours. He's made a lot of mistakes in the past 2 seasons and the more he makes the worse it will get for him. I would like to see Ramsdale in goal on Tuesday.

We don't have a very impatient fanbase. Years of failure from top to bottom with the same old mistakes being made tends to erode patience, yet considering the numbers we still get for home games, the atmosphere has rarely been toxic, it's just flat most of the time. We're no more impatient than fans of any other club our size and are far more patient than many.
 
Always like to be of service to those who don't know the facts.

Problem is you always get simpletons like you who STILL don't take any notice...:eek:

;)

I think you'll find someone has tweeted it actually and that therefore you are the simpleton ;)


Burts ‏@Burts_11
Sunjihi on S24SU says we have signed Lee Grant from Derby County. Bout time we replaced 'Teflon Long' #sufc #twitterblades
 
I think you'll find someone has tweeted it actually and that therefore you are the simpleton ;)


Burts ‏@Burts_11
Sunjihi on S24SU says we have signed Lee Grant from Derby County. Bout time we replaced 'Teflon Long' #sufc #twitterblades
Was I saying the rumour was wrong? Or that Sunjihi has got a lot of things wrong in the past?

I suppose you can never argue with Twitter though... :D
 
We don't have a very impatient fanbase. Years of failure from top to bottom with the same old mistakes being made tends to erode patience, yet considering the numbers we still get for home games, the atmosphere has rarely been toxic, it's just flat most of the time. We're no more impatient than fans of any other club our size and are far more patient than many.

giphy.gif
 



I'm just repeating myself because every new thread seems to be the same:
Played three, both strikers have scored, both have had clear cut chances, both have had goal disallowed for offside, and both scored around the twenty mark last season in poor sides.

They are not and will not be the problem.
 
I'm just repeating myself because every new thread seems to be the same:
Played three, both strikers have scored, both have had clear cut chances, both have had goal disallowed for offside, and both scored around the twenty mark last season in poor sides.

They are not and will not be the problem.

I agree with this. For a new partnership, I think they have looked OK. The type of service they both receive needs to change though.
 
Disagree, don't think they are similar at all. One chases everything and comes alive in the box, the other jumps (dare i say it) like Sammon and looks laboured. I think/hope Clarke will come good and forge a good understanding with Sharp, early days and plenty of graft on the training ground is required.

You re correct, Clarke is a totally different player to Sharp, so far Clarke is looking more like a donkey and would look good on Blackpool Pier. But like you said takes time I'm sure things will get better.
 
Is anyone genuinely happy with the variety of our striking options?

Calvert-Lewin - the only striker with any pace. Probably more suited to a season loan in league two at a club where he will be a regular starter. Doesn't appear ready for us yet.

Clarke - I can see the logic in him. Physical presence but also scores goals.

Sharp - solution one week, problem the next. Can go on great scoring runs and carry the team. But when he's not scoring, what does he contribute? If only he had pace.

McNulty - similar to Sharp though probably on a third as much money.

Done - scorer of scruffy goals. But will he ever get a chance to show what he can do as centre forward? If he's primarily to be used as a left winger we may as well try to offload.

Overall for the high tempo play Wilder wants I think we are miles off with our options. How many of them create a threat when they are not scoring, or worry the opposition?

At this level I'd rather take this approach - unless you're big, then be quick and be able to dribble. Preferably you are both.

Perhaps Deane and Agana with Joseph and Francis blinded me a little.

Looking at the players we have been linked with, I'd rather have Clarke plus Akinde (6'2", strong, quick, dribbler, scores goals), Bogle (6'2", strong, dribbler, scores goals), Lavery (quick, dribbler, scores goals) and Calvert-Lewin on loan than what we currently have.

I personally feel that goalscoring prowess aside, our current strikers don't bring enough attributes to the table in terms of their allround game.

Anyone share the same concerns?
 
You re correct, Clarke is a totally different player to Sharp, so far Clarke is looking more like a donkey and would look good on Blackpool Pier. But like you said takes time I'm sure things will get better.
Donkey?

Do you go to the games?
 
Is anyone genuinely happy with the variety of our striking options?

Calvert-Lewin - the only striker with any pace. Probably more suited to a season loan in league two at a club where he will be a regular starter. Doesn't appear ready for us yet.

Clarke - I can see the logic in him. Physical presence but also scores goals.

Sharp - solution one week, problem the next. Can go on great scoring runs and carry the team. But when he's not scoring, what does he contribute? If only he had pace.

McNulty - similar to Sharp though probably on a third as much money.

Done - scorer of scruffy goals. But will he ever get a chance to show what he can do as centre forward? If he's primarily to be used as a left winger we may as well try to offload.

Overall for the high tempo play Wilder wants I think we are miles off with our options. How many of them create a threat when they are not scoring, or worry the opposition?

At this level I'd rather take this approach - unless you're big, then be quick and be able to dribble. Preferably you are both.

Perhaps Deane and Agana with Joseph and Francis blinded me a little.

Looking at the players we have been linked with, I'd rather have Clarke plus Akinde (6'2", strong, quick, dribbler, scores goals), Bogle (6'2", strong, dribbler, scores goals), Lavery (quick, dribbler, scores goals) and Calvert-Lewin on loan than what we currently have.

I personally feel that goalscoring prowess aside, our current strikers don't bring enough attributes to the table in terms of their allround game.

Anyone share the same concerns?

I understand what you mean, but to say "when he's not scoring, what does he contribute?" About someone who scored 21 goals last season baffles me.

This is league one. We can't get a bunch of all rounders easily. Goals are the most important thing in the game. We have a player who regularly sticks the ball in the net. Until he stops doing this, you keep playing him.

It's doubly important because for a few years now we have had little to no contribution from midfield re goals.

It's thinking like "what does he contribute when he doesn't score?" That saw Keith Edwards dropped for Peter Withe. Enough said.

The issue is midfield. We need players to give our forwards the ball. Wingers. Players with an eye for a pass.
 
If you play the ball into Billy's feet he does contribute. I thought the last 20 minutes when we got it down he was the best player on the park.

He can also set up chances for others and link plays.

Bang on, he has fantastic close control and a footballing brain something many lacked last season, it's a bit hard to comment this early.
 
Would swap sharp, Clarke and done and probably chuck in a million on top for ched evans on the evidence of this season so far.... if only the board had some bottle
 
Would swap sharp, Clarke and done and probably chuck in a million on top for ched evans on the evidence of this season so far.... if only the board had some bottle

Sigh...

It's been 4 years, he's gone, move on.

Let's not turn this in to another Ched thread when there's a whole forum dedicated to him.
 
Would swap sharp, Clarke and done and probably chuck in a million on top for ched evans on the evidence of this season so far.... if only the board had some bottle

Yes and he'll probably bang a few more in before his retrial, then what?

How can you remotely be suggesting we spunk million quid on a bloke facing a lengthy trial and potentially a further spell inside?

t's been 4 years, he's gone, move on.

Let's not turn this in to another Ched thread when there's a whole forum dedicated to him

He was great for us for ONE season but the verdict completely knocked us over the edge and blew the season apart.

We have to move on.
 



Too similar types of players, which got me thinking...

Either we need to play the system we play now (as much as people hate long ball) but we need a pacey striker alongside either Clarke or Sharp (both can't play together in this system imo) but that means one of either being on the bench, i can't see us spending money to have Clarke sit on the bench, and there is no way in hell Sharp will be benched, hes captain after all. So this longball probably won't work with the set of players we have.

The other option could be, 4-3-3? If we have Clarke (as a target man) and Sharp holding the ball up for a pacey striker (even McNulty to a certain extent) with Sharp drifting out wide more it may work out, we'd be light in numbers in Midfield and would more than likely have less of the ball, but if we get Morsy or someone competent like him we should have enough Quality in midfield to make things happen..

Regarding Basham, I know Wilder came in and his first conversation with Basham was about where Basham thought his best position was, and he said Center mid... I just think we need to stick Basham at the back again, even if its just until we get a replacement.

Other things to note from me today, Scougall is still too lightweight and being as small as he is, he won't fit into the style of football we've been playing.

One other observation, Long needs to be given a break, for his own good. We have a very impatient fanbase (expectedly) and it won't do him any favours. He's made a lot of mistakes in the past 2 seasons and the more he makes the worse it will get for him. I would like to see Ramsdale in goal on Tuesday.

The problem is that Clarke is not a target man. We seem to be getting drawn into the fact that he's a bit taller than the others so therefore is the classic target man when he's always been better receiving the ball to feet. Yes, he's OK in the air but he's no Jostein Flo. If, therefore, we are going to play the "long ball" game, we a big, physical, target man as well as a pacy striker to play alongside and pacy midfield players to bomb forward and support them. We simply don't have players to play that style all the time so the we need to make sure that we play to the style for which CW has signed players already.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom