Pinchy
Blade, not Bladey.
If Wilder says that it implies his tactics are fairly basic. Which is fine by me.
I did point out though that Fleck had played as a deep lying midfielder and as an attacking midfielder so that indicates he has the ability to play as a traditional box to box midfielder.
The reference to Coutts was simply because you didn't apply the goal scoring criteria to your assessment of him as a midfielder so I'm struggling to see why you apply that criteria to another midfielder. If you think central midfielders should contribute to our goal tally, then surely you accept that Coutts isn't a suitable player for us?
Is there any 'if' about it? Of course a central midfielder should contribute goals, whether as creator or scorer or preferably both. It's not basic tactics to expect a midfielder to actually carry out that role. The fact that S2 let numpties like Montgomery do half a job for a decade is not my problem. He didn't get my permission or approval.
Of course basic is "fine" in S2. It's all most of you have ever known and hence you know no better. Your guru Diplodocus Dave is the Godfather of 'Basic'. The only pass he knows is up the Khyber, which is of course where his ugly primitive "football" belongs.
I'm not leading any crusade for Coutts. He hasn't done it consistently for us, but we have seen glimpses of class that few of our squad could match. I merely suggest that it might be worth persevering to see if he can come back fitter, hungrier and more committed. If not, let him go. But I won't shed a tear if Tufty gets rid of him tomorrow. It's not Coutts v Fleck.
I want two good strong athletic midfielders who can play pass and move football to the standard required to compete at the top of League One. I have no requirement at all that one of them be Paul Coutts so let's forget all that nonsense. What I don't want is a mediocre little Flecker who scores about once a season just because he's got a left foot and happened to be Coventry's least bad player one season.
The big Scottish fella is the one we should be after.