Swansea try to bore teams to death, they offer no real threat and are always playing it back to the keeper, if they go behind its game over for them. Thought last night we were not at it as we didnt expect them to be that negative , second half we should have had at least 2, so it onwards and upwards roll on saturday when we play luton who will come to play on the front foot
Well Wilder must have decided to play them at their own game then, because Cooper must have had more of the ball than anyone, in the first half.
They were pressing high up the pitch, quickly closing down our back four, so the ideal counter to that is obviously, playing it out from the back, which invariably translated to a combination of the following. Ahmehodivic, to Cooper, to Souttar, to Burrows, back to Souttar, to Souza, to Souttar, to Cooper, to Ahmehodivic, back to Cooper…..Boot it.
Against Watford, Cooper hit a superb ball down the right wing over the defender and Rak Saki ran onto it, beat a defender ran into the box and O’Hare scored. (Names of some characters may have been changed due to senility) Last night as we took our goal kicks, Brookes was invariably stood out on the right wing, his marker 20 yards away, surely it would be more productive to occasionally, mix it up a bit and let Cooper launch it towards their right side corner flag for Brookes/Rak Saki to run onto? I mean, I love Souttar, but he’s no Franz Beckenbaur and last night, his misplaced passes under pressure, could have dropped us in it against a better side.
The same principle applies to throw ins. We have a throw, in front of the South stand, 18 outfield players are that side of the centre spot, Brookes is stood alone on John Street stand side and his marker is usually around the centre spot. So we throw it up the line and try and weave a way through their 9 outfield players? Why couldn’t our thrower chuck it back to our talented left back to volley it across the other side of the pitch or quickly back to Cooper to pass it first time to Brookes?