The Bohemian
Member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2012
- Messages
- 525
- Reaction score
- 2,522
I know I go on about this topic a lot so you'll have to bear with me.
It may be simple minded of me, but to me playing a five man midfield with one poor sod on his own up front equals only one thing: less goals, because you only have one guy up front to do the scoring job, and if you have 2 half decent centre halves they can mark him out of the game, particularly if he's slow (Higdon) or small (McNulty). Even a good player can be nullified - look at Murphy on Saturday.
But I am constantly told that this doesn't matter, because the goals we lose will be compensated for by pressing midfielders drifting into the box. Well, yes, that might happen in the Premier League, but those players don't exist lower down.
However, Clough has since day 1 this season been wedded to 1 man up front and a central midfield 3 unless he gets desperate (when, funnily enough, we do commit men forward and sometimes score). That's all very well if you have midfielders that pop in the occasional goal.
We don't.
Here are the stats: the number of games that people we've had playing in the central midfield 3 have gone since they last scored a goal in the league for us:
Holt - never scored (played one game)
Coutts - never scored (played 2 games)
Ben Davies - 3 games (last goal v Swindon 20 September 2014), and you can argue he's more a wide man
Adams - never scored (played 4 games)
K Wallace - never scored (played 4 games)
J Wallace - never scored (played 10 games). I am amazed that he's actually managed so many games
Cuvilier - never scored (played 10 games)
Scougall - 10 games (last goal v Crewe 25 October 2014)
Reed - never scored (played 13 games)
Baxter -16 games (last goal v Preston 23 August 2014)
Doyle - 30 games (last goal v Swindon 29 March 2014)
This is appalling. I am at a loss to understand why we persist with 3 men in the middle when none of them are a goal threat, bar Davies (who has been out for months) and Baxter, who scored when he was playing further forward than he is now.
If Clough had gone out of his way to collect a bunch of players who were no goal threat collectively, it would have been harder to do a better job. This is poor squad building.
It wouldn't be so bad if they brought other things to the table, but these players rarely create anything (save Reed, recently) and as a bunch are smaller than many Under 16 teams on average.
thank goodness for JCR and Murphy, and McNulty (when he's selected). Without them we'd be in the bottom 6.
Our problem with scoring enough is about strikers not systems:
In 2011/12 we played with two up top and scored 92 league goals - 2 per game, with our strikers chipping in with 44 (48%) One scored 29!!!
In 2012/13 we played with two up top and scored 56 league goals - 1.22 per game, with our strikers chipping in with 30 (54%)
In 2013/14 with nobody up top for the first 13 games we scored 48 league goals - 1.04 per game, with our striker chipping in with 16 (33%)
In 2014/15 with one up top we have scored 39 league goals to date - 1.23 per game, with our strikers chipping in with 9 (28%)
Good strikers are hard to come by. Cloughie clearly set his stall out to get O Grady in before the season and failed, presumably due to Brighton paying Championship wages. His back up plan lacks the mobility to play alone and getting him on the pitch at all seems increasingly difficult, which left him with Porter and McNulty.
McNulty has to play off someone and I agree with those who suggest we should have played with two strikers at home against weaker teams - but given injuries and suspensions, who would the two have been? How often have Higdon and McNulty been available to play together?
The current squad is one good striker and a proper centre half short of challenging for the Top 2. The centre half should have been sorted and is down to Cloughie; the striker is more excusable but patience will wear ever thinner unless a solution is found soon.


