BLADES1988
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2016
- Messages
- 3,305
- Reaction score
- 5,618
Rusting, condemned, danger of floods, faded and bankrupt.
A small insight into the many reasons
A small insight into the many reasons
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Are they still on swamp gasFloodlights not up to standard either. Mostly night games.
They’ve been at reduced capacity due to health and safety for over a decade. That in itself speak volumes about the ground and how the club is managed.Been posted a couple of times this article now but is there really much difference in the capacity of the grounds now?
Wednesday's certainly isn't offering 40k+ in terms of safety. Just checked and it is reduced to 34,854 for safety reasons.
BDTBL I see is 32,050. So 2,804 difference. It's not as if they have been selling any more than 32,050 more than a couple of times in the past 2 decades and that has been end of season and folks coming out of the woodwork for a one off winner takes all survival type game.
Are they still on swamp gas
Isn’t the Sty a shed? It’s full of tools.
Don’t be daft. Dave Richards, Howard Wilkinson, Blunkett and Betts would make sure it goes back across the city. “But we’ve got a park you know”It must hurt them. The eyes of the country will be on Bramall Lane for the semi final if England get that far. Then it won't be forgotten in future if England win a bid for a mens tournament
I think Rotherham have a long standing relationship with the international women's game, hosting matches as far back as the 1990s.
It may say that, but what they mean is Hillsborough won't be filled, there will be empty seats everywhere. Not because there wasn't the demand for tickets, but because it has been deemed unsafe.But the article/comment is about why they chose BL over Hillsborough and the reasoning BL was chosen was that they don't expect crowds big enough to fill Hillsborough so opted for BL. have I got this wrong?
You’ve got this wrongBut the article/comment is about why they chose BL over Hillsborough and the reasoning BL was chosen was that they don't expect crowds big enough to fill Hillsborough so opted for BL. have I got this wrong?
Exactly. One’s reight good and the other’s a shithole. Nowt more to say.The article could really have been condensed down to this………..
View attachment 138697
View attachment 138698
View attachment 138700
The End
And if they ever reach the premiership who will pay for it not them but the FA againIf their stadium isn't upto date for some women's competition which let's be honest, won't be heaving with crowds despite the best efforts of organisers, imagine how bad it is for PL football should they ever have to worry about it?
We're getting Anel, they're getting fuck all![]()
The 34,854 figure is only to meet EFL standards. UEFA standards are much higher and there's no chance Leppings Lane would be allowed to open.Been posted a couple of times this article now but is there really much difference in the capacity of the grounds now?
Wednesday's certainly isn't offering 40k+ in terms of safety. Just checked and it is reduced to 34,854 for safety reasons.
BDTBL I see is 32,050. So 2,804 difference. It's not as if they have been selling any more than 32,050 more than a couple of times in the past 2 decades and that has been end of season and folks coming out of the woodwork for a one off winner takes all survival type game.
Exactly. One’s reight good and the other’s a shithole. Nowt more to say.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?