Sothall_Blade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 6,770
- Reaction score
- 8,682
P24 W4 D5 L15 Pts 17 Avg 0.71
Finishing 23rd with 42 points is bad enough. Based on Adam's record over the whole season we would have got 33 points and been relegated weeks ago.
He signed poor players and persisted in playing them for far too long. It was only when relegation was almost assured that he finally shuffled the pack and results improved slightly. Nobody can tell me he deserves to keep his job based on the results he's achieved.
The only good reason people can give for retaining him is that we need stability. I can understand that but my worry is that he needs to get immediate results next season or his position will very quickly become untenable. By this time he'll have filled the squad with his own type of players, we'll be maybe 10 games in and looking at another cycle of "wait until the next transfer window" before we can start to rebuild, again!
Surely it's far better and more likely to assure stability to change manager now. That would give the new man the whole pre-season to prepare and rebuild and this time both fans and board should be willing to stick with him for the full season and beyond.
I know McCabe says he won't put any more money in but if there's one final goodwill gesture he can do for the club, it's to fund the replacement of Adams with a young, upcoming manager who's proven he can get results on a tight budget.
For me that man is Keith Hill at Rochdale and there's no way he would turn us down. The bottom line is who would you trust to get us back up again quickest?
Finishing 23rd with 42 points is bad enough. Based on Adam's record over the whole season we would have got 33 points and been relegated weeks ago.
He signed poor players and persisted in playing them for far too long. It was only when relegation was almost assured that he finally shuffled the pack and results improved slightly. Nobody can tell me he deserves to keep his job based on the results he's achieved.
The only good reason people can give for retaining him is that we need stability. I can understand that but my worry is that he needs to get immediate results next season or his position will very quickly become untenable. By this time he'll have filled the squad with his own type of players, we'll be maybe 10 games in and looking at another cycle of "wait until the next transfer window" before we can start to rebuild, again!
Surely it's far better and more likely to assure stability to change manager now. That would give the new man the whole pre-season to prepare and rebuild and this time both fans and board should be willing to stick with him for the full season and beyond.
I know McCabe says he won't put any more money in but if there's one final goodwill gesture he can do for the club, it's to fund the replacement of Adams with a young, upcoming manager who's proven he can get results on a tight budget.
For me that man is Keith Hill at Rochdale and there's no way he would turn us down. The bottom line is who would you trust to get us back up again quickest?