PokerBlade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2015
- Messages
- 5,277
- Reaction score
- 12,067
The first part of this statement (up to the comma) is absolutely true, I've been mislead too many times mistakenly and on purpose to act otherwise. After the comma, it doesn't matter whether I've seen it or not I'm just saying it's one man's opinion of another and I may have a different one. Having said all that if I agreed with the judge, that would mean that McCabe acted improperly in that instance and as we know the prince's actions (moving the shares to a different company) were not entirely in good faith.
McCabe for me has built up a lot of kudos and this from one of the guys who 10 years ago was shouting 'where's money gone?' It's quite sad if this forum is representative of the fan base that as soon as he was ousted and now wants paying for an asset he has gone back to being the villain.
This is just more handwaving. It's really hard to take you seriously if you're basing your argument on the idea that the results of a high court case is just "one man's opinion".