William Henry Foulkes
Big Member
Then maybe players should remember Law 12 and just go down without the ott flying arms and stiff legs/rolls...
It's not the players, it's the whole culture of the game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Then maybe players should remember Law 12 and just go down without the ott flying arms and stiff legs/rolls...
I don't like the theatrical dives either but a ref can't pick up on the consequence and ignore the original offence.Then maybe players should remember Law 12 and just go down without the ott flying arms and stiff legs/rolls...
Have you seen it again HCDM ? That was my take on it in real time.It was a penalty, clear contact, Che didn't help with the way he went down - but that shouldn't really matter.
Have you seen it again HCDM ? That was my take on it in real time.
I'm waiting Bergen Blade screenshot and take on it. He's the go to guy on these things.

Seen it a couple of times but I'm still not sure what kind of contact there was, if at all.
View attachment 13602
Anyone seen this back yet ? I presume those with Blades Player can view it ?
I'm just intrigued as to whether he was caught or he feigned being caught.
Seen it a couple of times but I'm still not sure what kind of contact there was, if at all.
View attachment 13602
Only in force when it's against sufc not for them.What has happened to the Liverpool/Gerrard rule, even if there is no contact he intended to commit a foul so it is a penalty![]()
What has happened to the Liverpool/Gerrard rule, even if there is no contact he intended to commit a foul so it is a penalty![]()

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?