Just read the article and I find nothing wrong with it. He's an ex manger to both teams and when asked by the BBC who he think would win and why, he gave his answer. It's no more than any of us on here or all the blades who think Porter is any good or that Hill should be offered a contract for next season based on one good game. As someone who has worked in the game for years he can see that the biggest difference between the two teams in Rhodes. Hudds have a 20 goals a season player (who has come back into form) whereas we lost ours at the wrong time. So when you hear all these ex players / mangers / journalist talk about a certain player being the difference between the two sides for the CL semi / final - this is no difference. We just hope, that the so called star player will have a complete shocker, which it often does.
Finally, i'm pro-Warnock. I have no problem with him managing other clubs be it Leeds or QPR. Over the past 15 years, Warnock has been our best manager and no manger since him has been close to what he has achieved. Yes he made mistakes but don't we all in life and in work.
Finally, i'm pro-Warnock. I have no problem with him managing other clubs be it Leeds or QPR. Over the past 15 years, Warnock has been our best manager and no manger since him has been close to what he has achieved. Yes he made mistakes but don't we all in life and in work.
