The thing with McCabe I always valued was a sense of stability. You see so many clubs going to the brink of existence, like Wednesday, Rotherham, Derby, Bolton, Portsmouth etc. and with McCabe I always felt however bad things got that the club itself was never under threat. That means a lot to me. In terms of football decisions, and just generally striking me as a wanker...the guy was indefensible.
It means a lot to everyone that the club is stable
But in the footballing business, stability is about football and that's where everything starts and ends.
A club is built on its football foundations, without it being right, nothing else connected to a football club will succeed.
McCabe struck me as being like the boss of a corner shop.
If he pissed off Beryl who works behind the counter and she walked out, he could just go and employ somebody else instead.
It was almost as though footballers were like 1000 Beryl's and there was no difference between them.
It was like a footballer needed qualifications to be a footballer "Ahhh right laddie, it says on your CV that yer a footballer, is that right"
"Err yes"
"OK when can thar start, we've got some vacancies coming up because a couple of selfish twats don't wanna work here anymore, they've gone t'big supermarket down t'road cos they get more money or summat, can't understand em misen, they've got everything they need here, and the customers love em"
McCabe was not a bad Chairman, but he was not willing to take ANY sort of risk whatsoever, and for a succesful businessman there must have been huge risks taken in his other business ventures. I find it very strange that ranging between very average at it's best, and shockingly poor beyond belief at it's worst was considered good enough