Interesting stats and gives weight to your argument obviously. However in your opening summary, I'd discount the 'decent player' bit, the second one could be a disadvantage in some ways and the other two will be attractive to Kevin McCabe no doubt
To get to my point about Morgan and answer Pinchy's amusing response, I guess it's just a gut feeling that he'd be as good as anyone with better credentials for us. As it's often been mentioned before, the manager isn't the problem, more the tools he's been given to work with by KM.
Whether it be rookie Morgan or expert Mourinho, the players allowed to be brought in is more pertinent to relative success.
The players this season were just not up to the task in hand and sacking Danny Wilson was a last desperate throw by a desperate owner. Chris Morgan was handed a crock of shite and failed, but I have a hunch that given a fair crack of the whip he may well do better than a lot on here seem to think.
So its just a "hunch" and a "gut feeling" that Morgan might be a good manager. Is that like a woman's "intuition"?
And to be fair to Wilson, despite some appalling performances, he had managed us to be play off certs and still with automatic promotion in our own hands. Under Morgan the team played relegation form. Same players, the only difference was the manager (and as an aside we had a fabulous away record under Wilson - 11 wins and only 3 defeats. We lost all 3 away games under Morgan without scoring a goal).