stringer
Views my own.
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2016
- Messages
- 4,740
- Reaction score
- 6,396
Duffy turned 33 in OctoberCause Duffy is nearly 35 and Sharp nearly 33 no team is gunna spend millions on players that old
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Duffy turned 33 in OctoberCause Duffy is nearly 35 and Sharp nearly 33 no team is gunna spend millions on players that old
Read my post again and you will see that my assumption is:
a) We would be in the premiership and would be able to afford two wing backs of decent quality
b) These two would remain on the books as squad players and cover.
Now that you're being so clever what's your take on the valuation, which is what this thread is all about, instead of sitting on the sidelines being a smart arse and just being contradictory.
Cause Duffy is nearly 35 and Sharp nearly 33 no team is gunna spend millions on players that old
To be fair they have just taken the values from TransferMarkt. It isn't the writers opinion or anything.
No club would pay near a million for Duffy, Sharp and McGoldrick are similar I reckonDuffy is 33, as above.
How old is McGoldrick?
No club would pay near a million for Duffy, Sharp and McGoldrick are similar I reckon
No club would pay near a million for Duffy, Sharp and McGoldrick are similar I reckon
They need to drive traffic to the site somehow before Golden Tree sanction their restructuring program. Ramping up the hysteria is a failsafe way at the expense of quality.That makes it worse. There's so much lazy journalism that we now see it as a defence that the writer probably knows how terrible their sources are.
Welll not much moreNo club in the league would pay £1m for the leagues top scorer? You must be having a laugh.
Contradictory? Where's the contradiction?
So you think if we're in the premier league we should still undersell our players because they'd only be squad players? I'd say their value increases furthermore as they're Premier League players.
In today's market they're both worth double what your saying and even then you'd struggle to replace them.
No one said anything about selling them. Read again, it was about valuation, i.e. what some other club is likely to offer if they fancied them. So go on then, what's yours? Get off the fence.
Yeah what we value them at. Not what other clubs may or may not offer.
If you look again, you might see I answered.
I looked again and saw nothing other than a contradiction as to what the two WBs may be worth. So I assume you're agreeing with the rest of my valuations and its just these two you've got a problem with. That's fine with me, I'll take it as a compliment.
A contradiction on what they're worth? No I just disagreed with what you thought they were worth. Thought you'd seriously undervalued them.
Welll not much more
You're waffling on now and contradicting yourself. Baldock and Stevens are of L1/L2 pedigree prior to joining us and have nothing on their CV to suggest they have premiership credentials to justify the valuations you are talking about. They would both be taken to the cleaners at that level. However they deserve a shot at it to prove themselves as squad players initially and my valuation is based on this. Yours is based on the assumption they are premiership ready which is ludicrous.
Overall my valuation of the squad was about £37m which is being generous. You wish to more than double the value of these two and presumably the the rest, which would then value the squad at £74m which would be pie in the sky. So go on then, i'll invite you again to tag your valuation of the players alongside mine. I know this would mean you would actually have to put your cock on the block instead of wumming but give it a try.
Do you actually understand what contradict means?
I know what dodging the issue means. Read the thread title and have a go at it. I've already prepared the list, you only have to tag your values alongside it. Play the post etc, stop being a wum.
So....
1) Where are my contradictions?
2) What issue have a dodged?
How is disagreeing with your valuations of 2 players being a wum? It's not a wind up, it's a serious comment.
In today's market they're both worth double what your saying and even then you'd struggle to replace them.
And I'm the waffler.
I suggest you re-read the posts. Considering you actually 'responded' to my valuations of the players I disagreed with, I find it baffling why you persist on asking me to provide valuations.
Your frothing has clearly interrupted your thought process.
Hope that clears it up and you sleep well tonight.
Read the thread title again donut.
You really are waffling.
What's the thread title got to do with anything? It's a title encapsulating the article that is attached. You took it upon yourself to list your own valuations. That's fine, I disagreed with two of them.
I really am struggling to see the issue here.
So you agreed with the rest of them? Or did you just duck out when you realised you was talking nonsense and started wumming instead?
Talking nonsense.
From the guy accusing me of being contradictory ...3 TIMES, clearly when he doesn't even understand the meaning.
The guy who has asked me 3/4 times to give me own valuations, when I already had.
And I'm the one talking nonsense.
You need some sleep and a dictionary.
You could have left it at post #72 then when I accepted your compliment.
Nowt worse than (I assume) two grown men rutting. Give it a rest lads.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?