Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
I actually think it looks good. As a 30k+ traditional ground but below 40k is there a better one?
That was before they had a dessoWhatever architectural direction we take, we mustn't enclose the stadium.
Manchester United have and they need to (at last meeting) replace their pitch, three times a season.
Something to do with wind, speed and direction.
I know the new development plans that came about during our World Cup bid were pretty impressive and would be welcomed by many however this simply won't happen until we get to the promised land and demand forces the powers to be.....
But the away end.......
The smallest stand at the lane and one that in all fairness lets down the overall style of the ground regardless of the left hand side work to tie it in with the south stand.
Was this effective enough? Did we miss an opportunity?.......
I know most would say that there is little that we can do with that stand due to a main road running directly behind the stand, but this isn't true!!......
Many a ground have been faced with the same problem because of how football stadiums were traditionally built.......The solution being to build over the road with the wonders of modern day steel structures and engineering.....
So why didn't we do it?
.......................................................................................
I don't have the luxury of photoshop therefore I am just going to have to show what I mean with the wonder that is Microsoft Paint....
View attachment 22607
This in my opinion is what they should have done before working joining the away end to the south stand....They should have used a steel structure to increase the overall size of the stand in some way....Bring it out over the road like they have done at other grounds......Thus adding a good few rows and making the upper tier and the stand as a whole more attractive.
View attachment 22608
It could have been quite a nice stand in it end.......
And that my friends is my microsoft paint session over........[/QUOTE
Look a bit scabbish to me......
Think it was more a less complete sell out most games and don't forget we were restricted with a low away capacity and could have easily sold more home seats if available for the bigger games.Do we really need any more capacity?! Improving the kop to remove the pillars I agree with, adding more empty seats I don't. When we were in the PL we got 32/33k most games without it being a complete sell out, assuming we'd do the same again what we have is fine. Half empty stadiums look rubbish so why do we want one?
If and when the kop ever gets done it needs to be a total redevelopment. Flattened the mound and the pukka corner thing and rebuilding as one with a much greater rake and getting rid of all those steps from the turnstiles
The Kop needs to be done properly. Get rid of the slag and ashpile it is built on. Build at a steeper rake with seats and spacing like MK Dons. Don`t lose a co-ordinated atmophere by building it double decker. It won`t matter one bit if the roof line is higher than the rest of the ground. Make proper concourses with good facilities. Keep prices low to fill it.
I didn`t suggest keeping the same roofline. It would need to be higher. It would be possible to gain extra capacity from infill in the Cherry Strret corner, and perhaps by moving it back a little way with curves to join John Street and South Stand.Making it steeper whilst keeping the same roofline means a reduced Kop capacity.
Also making more spacing between seats like at MK again means a reduced Kop capacity.
So your proposal to spend millions to lower the capacity to about 28K ish.
Keeping prices low means it will never get the money back and be in massive debt for years.
I've said many times any proposals can't be a vanity project.
There must be a business plan, like they have on "The dragons" tv programme.
The men in charge of SUFC will want to know the cost of the project.
How much they predict income will increase with a projection of how long it will take to recoup the investment.
Mcacabe is a property development expert so will have no doubt wayed up all options. Would love to hear his honest off the record personal views on his plans and intentions. I would imagine McCabe will want it incorporate student accommodation, students usually don't need parking spaces and it's gauranteed income.
Agree with the others, would LOVE to see the Kop expansion, mainly because that's the worse stand, remove the pillars, bolt on 3,500 seats at the back at a steeper rake an build sizable covered concourse areas. A bolt on design is much much cheaper and means the Kop doesn't need to closed reducing capacity to 20K for a season (which would lose us more revenue).
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?