That Throw-in

[robbiez666]

I think I actually witnessed the worst (legitmate) throw-in I've actually ever seen today. The kind of incompetence children should be recreating in the playground.

 

[Greenwich Blade]

I think I actually witnessed the worst (legitmate) throw-in I've actually ever seen today. The kind of incompetence children should be recreating in the playground.

With Fleck's "cross" the Kop let out a collective "huh?"; with Baldock's throw it seemed to be disbelieving laughter. Never, in all my days...

 

[Deadly_D'Jaffo]

I think I actually witnessed the worst (legitmate) throw-in I've actually ever seen today. The kind of incompetence children should be recreating in the playground.

But it gave you something else to be cynical and hypercritical about, so you must have felt chuffed when it happened.

 

[robbiez666]

With Fleck's "cross" the Kop let out a collective "huh?"; with Baldock's throw it seemed to be disbelieving laughter. Never, in all my days...

To be fair, I could see what Fleck was trying to do.

 

[Greenwich Blade]

To be fair, I could see what Fleck was trying to do.

You might have had a better view than me, so if you'd like to explain.

 

[FredZeppelin]

My daughter was still giggling and laughing about it half an hour after we had left the ground. It was how it just hit Ossie's head and killed the momentum of the attack!
One of the more stupid things I've ever seen on a football field.
Well done George.
utb

 

[Hodgesleftpeg]

You might have had a better view than me, so if you'd like to explain.

Twat it against Bournemouth players legs and straight out into the away fans, taking two out with a straight kidney hit apparently

 

[Karaoke Blade]

I think I actually witnessed the worst (legitmate) throw-in I've actually ever seen today. The kind of incompetence children should be recreating in the playground.

I really don't know why we were taking short throws at that stage of the game anyway. Long throw into the box causes mayhem. (Well that's what other teams tend to do to us!).

 

[Digs blade]

But JLT was on the bench

 

[ken shabby]

Think Pemberton`s throw in v. West ham 1991 was a little better, that started an all in brawl, marvelous stuff !

 

[jono_t2000]

Can't mention throw ins without this beauty

View attachment 915571489075863552.mp4

 

[Moan? Nope-I saw Longhorn]

Can't mention throw ins without this beauty

View attachment 133886

Absolute genius yet the commentator (sic) calls it “bizarre” ?!?

 

[John Street West Terrace]

Pembertons roly poly throw against West Ham was better & also resulted in 2 players getting booked in the aftermath

 

[John Street West Terrace]

Can't mention throw ins without this beauty

View attachment 133886

Masterful piece of genius

 

[Northyorksblade]

Can't mention throw ins without this beauty

View attachment 133886

As soon as you said that I knew which one you meant. Superb!

 

[JimW1889]

What actually happened I didn't see it properly. Did he just throw it at Osborn's face?

 

[Rufus Smalls]

As soon as you said that I knew which one you meant. Superb!

The snowflakes in the Premiership now would rule the Saunders throw in as a free kick to the goalie for ungentlemanly conduct.

 

[Ainsley Harriott]

The snowflakes in the Premiership now would rule the Saunders throw in as a free kick to the goalie for ungentlemanly conduct.

Im almost certain that particular throw-in is now outlawed as a result of that. I do stand to be corrected, however.

 

[Northyorksblade]

The snowflakes in the Premiership now would rule the Saunders throw in as a free kick to the goalie for ungentlemanly conduct.

I nearly added, if a tad ungentlemanly!

 

[Panini]

The snowflakes in the Premiership now would rule the Saunders throw in as a free kick to the goalie for ungentlemanly conduct.

Im almost certain that particular throw-in is now outlawed as a result of that. I do stand to be corrected, however.

Nothing has changed since, or because of, Saunders. It's still allowed.

 

[Ainsley Harriott]

Nothing has changed since, or because of, Saunders. It's still allowed.

View attachment 133894

Aye, but does the second paragraph mean Saunders wouldn't have been allowed to score as it didn't touch "another" player?

 

[Panini]

Aye, but does the second paragraph mean Saunders wouldn't have been allowed to score as it didn't touch "another" player?

No, the Port Vale keeper was the other player in Saunders' case.

It means you can't throw it to yourself.

 

[Ainsley Harriott]

No, the Port Vale keeper was the other player in Saunders' case.

It means you can't throw it to yourself.

Fair enough then.

 

[wizadry]

I think I actually witnessed the worst (legitmate) throw-in I've actually ever seen today. The kind of incompetence children should be recreating in the playground.

It was almost as funny as when Joelinton smacked the ball into his own face, attempting a shot at goal in the process a few months ago.

 

[Greasy Chap Butty]

What actually happened I didn't see it properly. Did he just throw it at Osborn's face?

Yes, from about 3 feet away.
Ozzy was literally gobsmacked and Furious was furious

 

[Frank the tank]

Hope someone does a gif because I'm still laughing now thinking about that throw yesterday

 

[LudlamBlade]

Hope someone does a gif because I'm still laughing now thinking about that throw yesterday

Here you go!

 

[Rocketmark66]

Masterful piece of genius

It is up there with Edwards dummy on the goalkeeper (can't think who we were playing) for quick thinking imo.