Maidenhead
Well-Known Member
We didn't really get chance to judge him as a player at the time of his sale, so it's hard to for anyone to have an opinion unless you watched the youth team/saw his loan spells.
1 year later, he's definitely worth a hell of a lot more than £1.5m and you can't really defend the money we received. It's up to the coaching staff etc to spot talent at the club and not sell them on the cheap.
It will only look cheap if he pushes on much further than he is now, and there is a long way to go.
If the sale of one youth player funded the wages of 3 or 4 first team players in a championship winning team that looks like bloody good business to me.
Last summer we needed investment for the here and now not for some mythical time in the future.
If selling DCL helped us achieve promotion you could say that we got £1m or what it was for the player and an incidental bonus of £20m plus because we went up, and without the sale we may well not have done.
We won on the deal, DCL won (financially) on the deal, and the only potential losers are now Everton, but their liability is restricted by the price they paid and their subsequent investment in the player,and they can afford it more than we can.
Bloody good deal and management all round I say.
If the sale of one youth player funded the wages of 3 or 4 first team players in a championship winning team that looks like bloody good business to me.
Last summer we needed investment for the here and now not for some mythical time in the future.
If selling DCL helped us achieve promotion you could say that we got £1m or what it was for the player and an incidental bonus of £20m plus because we went up, and without the sale we may well not have done.
We won on the deal, DCL won (financially) on the deal, and the only potential losers are now Everton, but their liability is restricted by the price they paid and their subsequent investment in the player,and they can afford it more than we can.
Bloody good deal and management all round I say.