ChipButtyBlade
Well-Known Member
I have to say Norwood does make us look weaker and the oppo always seem to get a goal within minutes of him coming onto the pitch.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Who would you have put o
Archer playing well with Diaz so he takes our striker for McAtee makes no senseNah not subs.
Look at the stats. We were hanging on all game. You can't usually get away with it against tip half sides let alone one with a budget like Manchester United
Was Norwood even at fault for either of the goals?
Fernandes had acres of space to shoot.
Archer playing well with Diaz so he takes our striker for McAtee makes no sense
That far out on his weak foot? Fair enough. Can’t blame people for thatFernandes had acres of space to shoot.
Again!I’m afraid to say Wilders subs cost us yet again
No I fuckin wouldn’tBollocks. Anyone but Norwood but you’d have moaned your head off if he’d made a different substitution and it had lead to a goal for them anyway.
No I fuckin wouldn’t
Anybody that dosen’t hang us out to dry like this fraud has. Glad you’re enjoying it!..and your sensible suggestion as to how to get rid of the owner and who would replace him is ??
Its frustrating. If we had a solid defence and a team of Ben Osborne's who will run for days then it’s not a bad tactic but we don’t sadly. Expecting to win a game with 20-25% possession and a very questionable defence is a really tough ask for any team.It’s ironically a tactic designed to keep us in games and concede fewer rather than going toe to toe. We still conceded 4 though, again.
It does keep us in games longer I suppose
Why bring on McAtee and not Osula at that timeThe same Archer that’s been out injured and is lacking match fitness?
Norwood gave the ball away again and again.shit substitution.I have to say Norwood does make us look weaker and the oppo always seem to get a goal within minutes of him coming onto the pitch.
Sam CurtisWho would you have put on?
Why not make simpler subs? Bogle looked knackered, so why not just put Curtis on.Shall we just run the players into the ground then?
First half we had 17% possession
As of now (89 mins) we’ve had 26%… we probably run more off the ball. So we have to make changes
Why bring on McAtee and not Osula at that time
Oh yes they didNo they didn’t.
Did he?Norwood gave the ball away again and again.shit substitution.
It’s a combination of his choice of subs throughout every gameBecause McAtee is a better player and will hold onto the ball better. You can’t seriously be using that substitution to have a go at Wilder?
My problem is that we have a busted flush, stubborn as fuck manager who continuously makes bad tactical decisions and that we have an owner that has single handedly made us in to a complete laughing stock. For me it is the most embarrassing season since I have been a blade. Everything appears to be hunky dory for you though clearly.So your problem isn’t that we conceded the goals then?
It’s a combination of his choice of subs throughout every game
My problem is that we have a busted flush, stubborn as fuck manager who continuously makes bad tactical decisions and that we have an owner that has single handedly made us in to a complete laughing stock. For me it is the most embarrassing season since I have been a blade. Everything appears to be hunky dory for you though clearly.
The archer who has hardly played so isn't fit you mean?Archer playing well with Diaz so he takes our striker for McAtee makes no sense
Look at how many chances mcatee crested on SaturdayWhy bring on McAtee and not Osula at that time
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?