axel smeets
Blade in Pig Land
Why Axel? Tell me why. Anybody tell me why?
Because he has signed the cheques with McCabe. Perhaps we are guilty of not signing black players?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Why Axel? Tell me why. Anybody tell me why?
Must be a big company to put the kind of money he has at Rotherham.
Because he has signed the cheques with McCabe. Perhaps we are guilty of not signing black players?
We haven't yet breached 20k this season. Our last home match (vs. Port Vale) was the closest we've come - 19,699."First League One match with over 20,000". Haven't we got over 20,000 for every Home game???
We haven't yet breached 20k this season. Our last home match (vs. Port Vale) was the closest we've come - 19,699.
Fulham football club is no way a middle class club. Just because it is in Fulham.Fulham
The whole point was not what was on our books that summer but what the budget was for the following summer. Of course certain contracts had to work through but those players had to be replaced by youths or cheap signings.
It may be "history now" but it's exactly why McCall didn't think he could come back and why we couldn't recruit an experienced manager. Not only was there no money to spend but the manager had to slash wages costs. Weir believed he would be given time and then the prince arrived and the ball game changed.
So many on here had their heads in the sand, including Bladesway who battled me for months on this issue.
I wish the prince had not arrived and we would have gotten ourselves a Chris Wilder much earlier in the piece. I've always said that and it is so true.
Some people are so desperate to be perceived as being right, even when they're wrong.
It's more important than us winning for some.
After all the ridicule I got on here in 2012 for pointing out the strategy which McCall has now outlined above, yes it is important to me to remind certain posters about it because they made it personal and yes it is good to be proved correct.
"More important than winning" is an unworthy comment which maybe says more about you Pete.
The fact that you've held on to 'ridicule' that you might have received from over 4 years ago should say rather a lot to you too.
I am often reminded of my posts from back then by people like you actually Pete.
Only this week Axel quoted one on this thread from way back then. Nothing wrong with that (other than it being totally out of context)!!
All part of expressing one's views which is the point of a Forum.
"Both working class clubs" ?? Show me a football team that is not working class apart from Arsenal.
I feel like there's a song I should sing to you made famous by a Disney ice princess.
All together now...
"Both working class clubs" ?? Show me a football team that is not working class apart from Arsenal.
Reading, QPR, MK Dons
Fulham
Reminds me of when I went to a Rugby cross code game at Knowsley Road St Helens vs Sale Sharks. The first half was the borefest of Yawnion and the second half the proper, ball in hand open running, game.You are joking surely.
You must mean affluent.
Go to a Rugby Union game, and you will see middle class sport.
I found this an interesting read although took it with a pinch of salt at the same time especially when the Sheff Utd bit has conflicting information on it!
I scanned down it from top to bottom looking at the billionaires and millionaires, don't know why but Newport Town's owner made me laugh for about 5 minutes. Don't know why, most of us would do it.
Forgot to put the link in!https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_football_club_owners
No it's just wrong.Why are we shown as being 100% owned by Prince Abdullah? Did I nod off and miss something important, again?
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?