RMBlade
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2015
- Messages
- 1,582
- Reaction score
- 1,540
Why do we need to play wingers? We have an abundance of CM's Id like to see something like this
-------Basham-------
Hammond----Reed
-------Baxter---------
-Sharp----Sammon
With Harris and Freeman (Brayford when he is back) providing the width.
Basham - Sits infront of the back 4 never gets forward (except set pieces).
Reed - has the legs to get up and down the pitch and is slightly defensive minded
Hammond - not as mobile as Reed but is defensively minded so when Freeman/Brayford are bombing forward he can cover.
Baxter - Can just sit behind the strikers linking everything together.
All of these players are interchangeable with J Wallace, Coutts, Scougs able to come in.
I do think you need Scougs or Reed as one of the 2 CM's though because the rest are immobile.
The issue with 90% of our problems is midfield. Granted Sharp has missed sitters and the defence isn't going to set the world alight but if we can control the game from midfield I feel we will have a better chance of success.
-------Basham-------
Hammond----Reed
-------Baxter---------
-Sharp----Sammon
With Harris and Freeman (Brayford when he is back) providing the width.
Basham - Sits infront of the back 4 never gets forward (except set pieces).
Reed - has the legs to get up and down the pitch and is slightly defensive minded
Hammond - not as mobile as Reed but is defensively minded so when Freeman/Brayford are bombing forward he can cover.
Baxter - Can just sit behind the strikers linking everything together.
All of these players are interchangeable with J Wallace, Coutts, Scougs able to come in.
I do think you need Scougs or Reed as one of the 2 CM's though because the rest are immobile.
The issue with 90% of our problems is midfield. Granted Sharp has missed sitters and the defence isn't going to set the world alight but if we can control the game from midfield I feel we will have a better chance of success.