Sky say Porter attracting lots of interest!

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




That reads like Port's agent wrote it...

Porter joined United from Derby in the summer of 2011 and is a proven goalscorer having netted his 100th career goal last season.
 
My guess would be a side like Shrewsbury, Tranmere etc.
 
There is absolutely no logic in getting rid of Porter unless we've got two decent strikers coming in. We need at least one striker now regardless of any outgoing deals. Porter's a better option than Ironside, and at the minute in the formation we're playing if argue he's a better option than Taylor too. He missed a sitter against County but had an otherwise decent game. Taylor is yet to score or have a decent game from what I've seen.
 
Cue half the people on here that constantly slag porter off demanding to know his fee/ why were selling our only "world beater" :)
 
There is absolutely no logic in getting rid of Porter unless we've got two decent strikers coming in. We need at least one striker now regardless of any outgoing deals. Porter's a better option than Ironside, and at the minute in the formation we're playing if argue he's a better option than Taylor too. He missed a sitter against County but had an otherwise decent game. Taylor is yet to score or have a decent game from what I've seen.

There were at least two players who looked like triallists at the training today, one may have been Baker from Coventry, and I heard someone say Jervis(?) was another
 
Could be him, although the hair style has changed

Judging from his Twitter it's alot different to the Wiki page.

Bloody hell, 21 years old and he's had more clubs than I've had hot dinners.

I thought the same! Thankfully they're loans rather than permanents, I'd be more worried if he'd had more than a couple of permanent transfers.
 



There were at least two players who looked like triallists at the training today, one may have been Baker from Coventry, and I heard someone say Jervis(?) was another

Sounds unusual for two players under contract to be displayed in an open training session, unless the deals are virtually decided.
 
There is absolutely no logic in getting rid of Porter unless we've got two decent strikers coming in. We need at least one striker now regardless of any outgoing deals. Porter's a better option than Ironside, and at the minute in the formation we're playing if argue he's a better option than Taylor too. He missed a sitter against County but had an otherwise decent game. Taylor is yet to score or have a decent game from what I've seen.

I made the wild prediction after Ironside spooned the ball over the bar from about two yeards on Saturday, that he will go his entire professional career without scoring, he's never looked like it an any game I've seen.

As for Taylor, he had one fantastic run in the first half where he picked the ball up in the right back position and drove into the opposition half. He knocked the ball through to Murphy, who just never made a diagonal run and the move broke down. Taylor went ballistic and looked as though he cared and coupled with the skill he showed on the run, I thought he showed some promise.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom