Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Thank you for your input carty
That didn't for a startYou know a while ago when you vowed to leave the forum for good? What happened?
I find little to disagree with here, apart from the constant Simo hate.
One question though, where has our pace been this season? You know, the season that got us to 90 points?
Ched certainly wasn't quick. Only Philips I can think of and he wasn't here that long, nor on our best runs.
PURE COMEDY GOLD
By the way boys and girls - not a cat in hells chance of winning play-offs. Zero pace, and Swiss thinks Flynn is quick!!!!!
It is true that our success this season has been mostly down to our players' technical ability. No teams in this division can match our skill. Ched has looked quicker than most opponents though and we have definitely missed his running on and off the ball, not just his goalscoring.
Don't disagree with that at Bergs. Although, I'd still never have called Ched quick. Just 'better' and that extra talent and movement made him look half a yard quick.
I'd go Cresswell and O'Hall on Monday.
Don't agree. I thought we looked more dangerous as the game went on and Quinn was the key to this.Difficult one, isnt it? They all did well last night and I thought we edged it. But for all the craft and defensive work, we don't look like we've got goals in us set up like that.
UTB
As long as Porter doesn't start, I'll be happy. Taylor in for Hill too please.
I've never been one for scapegoating players, but these two just aren't good enough. Sorry lads.
Hill played well last night. Stronger than Taylor,quicker and better in the air. Both have a touch of 'Nyron' about them defensively. I wouldn't have Taylor on the bench let alone starting
It's definitley the distribution that lets Hill down. He's nowhere near as good as Taylor for that but he's more of an overall athlete. Both are 3rd division players in fact and ability.
UTB
Oh come off it , porter wasn't great but philliskirk is totally unproven with not one scrap of evidence to suggest he might be any good in the first teamwho says wilson wont stick with the same starting 11?
i hope cresswell starts upfront monday alongside philly(think we need some young legs upfront)to offer a dimension up front that we have missed since c@@d.
the goals have to come from somewhere,why not take a gamble on the young lad-or stick with poorter.
thank god for a voice of reason at last.Oh come off it , porter wasn't great but philliskirk is totally unproven with not one scrap of evidence to suggest he might be any good in the first team
Not one scrap
As long as Porter doesn't start, I'll be happy. Taylor in for Hill too please.
I've never been one for scapegoating players, but these two just aren't good enough. Sorry lads.
Flynn is quick!!!!!
At what ?Taylor is 20 times better than Hill
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?