Bergen Blade
Well-Known Member
Who would be the best choice?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Here here!Out of them 5 players it's McNulty every day of the weak,pure and simply because he's our best striker from what iv'e witnessed.
That's McNulty on the bench then.Here here!
Where? Where?Here here!
Play 4-6-0 and win on pensWho would be the best choice?
Who would be the best choice?
Southampton have to make changes up front too - Pelle is suspended after picking up another booking at the weekend.
Schneiderlin is a big player for them and is a doubt too.
I've gone McNulty as he seems the most capable of nicking a goal against the run of play. I think both Baxter and Murphy could do well but they're needed elsewhere. We don't currently have anyone to replace Murphy out wide so we can't involve him more and use him to stretch their defence with a move centrally. I think Baxter would be most useful in that deep lying role, helping keep possession occasionally so we're not completely over run in midfield.
Do we want to be showing off young Reed so he can be sold even quicker than all the other talent we've produced in recent years?
Interesting analysis on Murphy and quite right too.What i would say is Bertrand is just as good and as quick on the other side,what i think i'd be inclyned to do is put Murphy up top with McNulty and put Harris on the left with McEveley behind him,put Flynn on the right with Alcock behind him if fit,this would nullify the threat they possess from both full backs,Basham and McGahey at CB with Doyle and Reed in the middle,with the option in the game of putting Basham in there to make a three with the other players on the pitch being able to make a back four if a tactical change is required.Tadic is another classy player they have who likes to drift outwide to pick it up and cut inside,so if he plays he is the one to watch out for imo.Baxter for me, he works better in a system when we are counter attacking. To me its not just who plays upfront its also where we play Murphy. He is our best player this season by far but I think he will struggle against Clyne (should he play) maybe we should start him on the right?
As close as possible to last years cup team:-
------------------Howard
Flynn Basham McEvely Harris
JCR Scougall Doyle Reed Murphy
-------------------Baxter
Subs:- Turner, McGahey, Cuvelier, K.Wallace, McNulty, Adams, Higdon
I don't think it would be a huge issue in a midfield three, his composure would outweigh it I think. Get your point though. I do like Murphy up front, he's been ineffective out wide lately.I think one of the main arguments for using Baxter up front is that will mean he won't be in midfield. I think it's vital that we have enough work rate in midfield. I think Sothall_Blade 's team is good, although lack of height is an obvious weakness.
I don't think it would be a huge issue in a midfield three, his composure would outweigh it I think. Get your point though. I do like Murphy up front, he's been ineffective out wide lately.
I liked us going with 4-1-2-1-2 the other day. Good fluidity between Murphy/Baxter/Wallace and to a lesser extent Murphy and the strikers. Swap McNulty for Higdon and I'd try that more. It could work well tonight as would make sure the game remains narrow, albeit our wingers were key last season. Even so Doyle sitting, Baxter and Wallace, then Murphy would be tempting for me.
Not sure we will need to worry about strikers, a defence that can defend would be good.
Yeah, in hindsight that was a stupid comment. As I wrote It i thought, why play two up top, and secondly the Murphy free role wouldn't work. Basically have no idea why I ever said it. Sincere apologies.Clough laughed at the thought of playing it tonight...
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?