Flatulent_Bob
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2009
- Messages
- 15,148
- Reaction score
- 20,944
I think Berge was done because he was clearly a talent outside our normal expected reach, and we had a clear run on him if we did the deal in January.What I can't understand is that we forked out 20m for Berge, when we can easily get by without him, given the midfield cover we have/had, yet it seems like we can't or won't spend similar on a position where we are crying out for some talent. Doesn't make sense. We'll end up losing out to Palace or Leeds thanks to our dithering. It's The Blades Way you know!
Simply put it was a too good an opportunity to turn down.
These deals take time, and Berge's had been started in the summer so only needed concluding. I'm certain we know our targets, and we're aiming to have one or two in before the window closes but we don't have the funds to overspend and close the deals quickly unlike Villa.