Bladesman
The Great Grumbleduke
Just chill everyone. He’s signed.
We need the source.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Just chill everyone. He’s signed.
Redirect Notice
www.google.co.uk
Bielsa would know.Maybe keeping it quiet even though signed just to surprise the weeds
Maybe keeping it quiet even though signed just to surprise the weeds
Also at least the 5th person to make this statement in the last 4 weeks. Trust no one.You kinda need to tell people how you know? Or what you've heard.
Otherwise, people tend to think new, over confident, wannabe ITK'S are either on the wind up or bellends.
Not saying you're either, just letting you know what the general vibe will be.
you should have told the manager that then as apart from.maupay he didn't seem bothered about any of these thousands of other footballers
Maybe ...just maybe he was working within a budget
It’s bad use of punctuation. Places 20 - 16 are positive figures, then it’s negative from there.What's with the random order of the list? Chelsea and Liverpool 19th and 20th with more spend than Palace, Leicester etc.
So we know that the pandemic cost us £20 - 30m - but what did we actually get for finishing 9th in the Premier League, it must have been more than enough to cover that ( unless we'd budgeted to finish so high!)I'm not sure it's fair to accuse the club of bad planning since the pandemic has cost the club £20-30 million.
If we're trying to sign players we know we can't afford, it would seem like a daft waste of time.
I'm surprised we've not used the loan market more given the financial situation tbqf
They were the only players wilder was interested inSo they, along with Maupay, were the only players within our budget? Ok.![]()
They were the only players wilder was interested in
NView attachment 92980ot seen this posted on here.
Not a twitter regular so make your own minds up.
26.6k followers.
NView attachment 92980ot seen this posted on here.
Not a twitter regular so make your own minds up.
26.6k followers.
Be cause we talked to maupay and signed the restHow do you know? And if they were, maybe they shouldn’t have been.
It's been a 'done deal' according to random Twitter users for about 3 weeks now.
Yeah OK lolBERGE , RAMSDEN AND FULLBACKS.
We definitely would have got at least a couple of million as a loan fee. Not just let him go for free.What was completely stupid was lettimg Freeman fo to Forest on loan. We should have at least recouped what we paid for him. This was especially true given we knew they were goimg to get a big fee for Cash
Be cause we talked to maupay and signed the rest
Why should we have been.interested in anyone else ? Is 9th not good enough for you ?
There’s been 20 pages to scroll through since I last looked. Forgive me.Scroll back 5 pages
So who should he have signed for comparable fees and wages ?9th is great, it massively outweighed all but the most optimistic of us on here’s expectations, but it could have been even better, and could have contributing to us making a better start this season.
Can you really not grasp that, yes, we did brilliantly last season; really fucking brilliantly, but if we’d made better big money signings in attacking positions we might have done even better and set ourselves up to make a better start to this season? Wilder can even see that, hence why two of the signings are no longer here, so why are you so intent on denying he might have made mistakes even he is acknowledging by trying to replace them? That will really scramble your “in Wilder we trust” mantra.
“But he signed them”
“But he got rid of them...” repeat to fade.
I await an hilarious gif in response.
Like a child’s response when they know they are wrong.Yeah OK lol
A scenario for you: You’re trying to get Player A who you’re confident would score 10 goals for the team this season. It’s a tricky transfer, but there’s a chance it could happen still before the deadline, and if late on it still looks unlikely Player B could still be signed. Player B it’s felt would likely deliver 5-6 goals this season, and because fewer clubs are interested and it’s a cheaper deal it’s an easier and quicker one to get over the line (both internally and externally).
Are you saying it’s better to just get Player B in now rather than hold out for Player A as long as possible?
So who should he have signed for comparable fees and wages ?
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?