Return of the Mc's

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Chabuddy G

Kurupt FM
Joined
Jun 12, 2020
Messages
2,755
Reaction score
5,383
McBurnie and McGoldrick.
The partnership that I really didn't see working as they both like to drop deep, as much as I like them individually.
Well I think me and anyone else who doubted it can admit we were wrong. It's probably the best partnership we've seen so far (as much as I'd like to see Oli/Lys) and has made us a much more dangerous team as a unit.

McBurnie is still winning all the headers but now people are getting around him, and I think that's because Didsy is up there so players know there's always going to be someone up there to help retain the ball. So they don't feel it's as much of a risk getting upfield and that we won't get countered as easily as when it's Billy with him (sorry Bill). It makes us a much more effective unit and doesn't look like aimless, isolating long ball when McBurnie and Sharp are partnered up top.
Also you've got the most important cog in the whole attacking unit... David f**king McGoldrick. So much more than just a link up man, he's big and strong, he's agile, so good positionally, and has all the flair in the world. And I'm so glad he's scored.

Not just them though, I think the birth of the real Sander Berge has helped as he's just a more intelligent footballer than Lunny, and the freshness of Ben Osborn with his intense pressing. As hard as it is to leave Fleck out for the last 3 imo we have to.

Didsy - brilliant as always in most games this season outside the box, but I must admit I just had a feeling he'd never score in this division. It was going to take one going in off his arse for him to get his first, and it almost was! But let's see if he can go on a run now with a bit of confidence, I don't doubt it.
I always backed McBurnie and even when the chips were down I stuck my head above the parapet because I saw what he was against us and so many other Championship sides the 2 years prior. The stick he's got despite getting absolutely no service has been proper shit, it's never been a lack of effort.
Anyway, thank fuck this has fallen into place - just in the nick of time.

The eyes Chico, they never lie...

1594812347062.png

X


1594812411785.png
 



Despite the result on Saturday I'd still prefer McBurnie to play alongside a pacey striker with McGoldrick playing behind in the 10 role.
 
Am I missing something with all this Scarface bollocks and McBurnie?
I've seen Shoreham St Magnifique posting about it but don't get it.
Don't understand what a film about a Cuban drug lord in Miami has to to do with a ginger Scottish footballer from Leeds with a drink driving charge
 
I’m sure someone can find the stats for our goals per game with and without McGoldrick but from memory we look significantly more dangerous with him in the side (whoever else is up top) and have scored significantly more goals

if I was wilder I’d be asking the scouts to comb the world looking for his long term successor - without a number 10 atm he’s so key to Everything we are doing.
 
McBurnie and McGoldrick.
The partnership that I really didn't see working as they both like to drop deep, as much as I like them individually.
Well I think me and anyone else who doubted it can admit we were wrong. It's probably the best partnership we've seen so far (as much as I'd like to see Oli/Lys) and has made us a much more dangerous team as a unit.

McBurnie is still winning all the headers but now people are getting around him, and I think that's because Didsy is up there so players know there's always going to be someone up there to help retain the ball. So they don't feel it's as much of a risk getting upfield and that we won't get countered as easily as when it's Billy with him (sorry Bill). It makes us a much more effective unit and doesn't look like aimless, isolating long ball when McBurnie and Sharp are partnered up top.
Also you've got the most important cog in the whole attacking unit... David f**king McGoldrick. So much more than just a link up man, he's big and strong, he's agile, so good positionally, and has all the flair in the world. And I'm so glad he's scored.

Not just them though, I think the birth of the real Sander Berge has helped as he's just a more intelligent footballer than Lunny, and the freshness of Ben Osborn with his intense pressing. As hard as it is to leave Fleck out for the last 3 imo we have to.

Didsy - brilliant as always in most games this season outside the box, but I must admit I just had a feeling he'd never score in this division. It was going to take one going in off his arse for him to get his first, and it almost was! But let's see if he can go on a run now with a bit of confidence, I don't doubt it.
I always backed McBurnie and even when the chips were down I stuck my head above the parapet because I saw what he was against us and so many other Championship sides the 2 years prior. The stick he's got despite getting absolutely no service has been proper shit, it's never been a lack of effort.
Anyway, thank fuck this has fallen into place - just in the nick of time.

The eyes Chico, they never lie...

View attachment 85796

X


View attachment 85797

I agree with this post because you quite rightly alluded to the support player mechanism from the likes of Berge and Osborn. Now that Wilder has more players to fit that mechanism, he will be able to select “horses for courses” so the contribution of Fleck and Lundstram for example will keep opposition managers guessing.
We now have a settled side, but the individuals are starting to become interchangeable, which is the best kind of progress.
The slipper fits. 👍
 



Am I missing something with all this Scarface bollocks and McBurnie?
I've seen Shoreham St Magnifique posting about it but don't get it.
Don't understand what a film about a Cuban drug lord in Miami has to to do with a ginger Scottish footballer from Leeds with a drink driving charge
Some people just lack imagination.... 😂 😂 😂
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom