Woodwardfan
Woodwardfan
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #31
The game has changed a lot, it's no longer all about prestige, it's now all about money.
The clubs,players and the referees know this,but the problem is the fans haven't caught up yet ...
Well said. Sums up my OP in just a few wo
Has refereeing changed or has the scrutiny of the press and media just turned everything around? I hear about this 100MPH game that the poor dears can't keep up with and think its laughable. In the past the pitches could be mud baths which brought its own issues for refereeing.
I don't think there are more contentious decisions (I don't remember a time when I didn't think referees at BDTBL were shite) I just think we have a 24/7 sport hungry media looking for every decision to give Alan Brazil and Warnock something to discuss, then over to Colin Murray, Hawksbee and Jacobs and the coup de grace delivered by Adrian Durham at 4pm.
The game isn't that different but the 249 cameras at every single game make it a very different discussion point.
I still remember to this day Hansens handball in the League Cup Final pretty much on the line that got missed (mid 80's?) Then there was the 1966 was it, wasn't it decision in a world cup final. Now days rather than getting on with the game we would be having a jerkathon over goal line technology or (shite)Hawkeye, somesuch or something or other.
The more we fuck about with the basics of the game the further away it gets from us.
Take cricket as an example. Its clear that without technology umpires in the past were wrong so many times it made the game a lottery. Now that technology has been introduced it shows up the serious limitations of umpires and helps them do their job properly.
Personally I would allow refs to refer to the 4th official who should have a screen whenever that is available. No, it couldn't be available in Concord Park but so what? There is enough money in the game to provide it throughout the football league.
My main theme however is to get the authorities to give the refs every backing to purge out cheating and dissent/intimidation. Whenever the clubs and media moan about sendings off and multiple red and yellow cards they always back off and hang the refs out to dry. Book the divers, book the wrestlers at corners, adopt zero tolerance for dissent. If they repeat the offence or argue book them again and send them off. I reckon it would take little more than a month to clean up the game and then the refs can set about officiating in a much easier scenario.
Simple but would it be the bigger clubs who lose out the most? Yes it would and that's why it won't happen. The big clubs have the most cheats and also intimidate the refs the most. Cheating is a honed skill these days and the top clubs are the best exponents.