Honestly I just don't get the 'he looks miles off the PL' statement that some are saying. How exactly? What are his obvious weak points? What could he do better ? His marking at set plays? His pace? If the latter, John Egan is hardly a sprinter and probably no quicker than Andersen ? so what is A's obvious deficiency that makes him short of PL quality in peoples opinion on here?
Not disputing peoples opinion of him as we all see different things, but genuinely what is it that people see (or don't see) that makes him look short of say our own John Egan, in potential? I just see Andersen as a leader and a solid centre half who is no slouch. Not saying he is what we need, just genuinely interested in hearing what others see (in his weaknesses) that are readily apparent to a mere mortal like me? Other than pace....(which Egan for example is hardly blessed with but makes up for it in know how).